Paper · 2020 · Nigeria Agricultural Journal

COMPARATIVE EFFECT OF AQUEOUS MORINGA EXTRACTS (LEAF AND POD) AS FOLLIAR FERTILIZER ON COCOYAM YIELD

N.E. Ebido

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of aqueous moringa extract (leaf and pod) as a foliar fertilizer was studied in the cocoyam research farm,National Root Crop Research Institute, Umudike, Abia State. The study was aimed at determining the effect ofthe extracts on the yield of two cultivars of Cocoyam. Extracts were produced by milling moringa leaf and podseparately, and diluted with water at the ratios of 1:1 and 2:1(v/v) each. The experimental design was a 5x2factorial in a randomized complete block design replicated three times. The factors are; five treatments (control,AMPE 1:1, AMPE 2:1, AMLE 1:1 and AMLE 2:1), and two Cocoyam cultivars (NCe 001 and 012). Eachreplicate had 10 treatment combinations. Treatments were applied on plant leaves at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks afterplanting. Data collected were growth (number of plant stands at harvest), and yield (weight and number of cormsand cormels). The results indicate that the AMPE gave better yield than AMLE. When compared with the control,all the treatments gave higher yield, with AMPE 2:1 having higher yield of about 20% on NCe 012 and AMPE 1:1with about 50% on NCe 001. Amongst the two cultivars, there were significant differences in their yield, withbetter performance from NCe 012. Results showed that moringa extract can be considered as a good organicfoliar fertilizer for enhanced yield of Cocoyam. This is attributed to its composition of growth hormones andnutrients which are present in sufficient quantities and suitable proportions, capable of increasing growth andyield of various crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moringa pod extract (AMPE) gave better cocoyam yield than moringa leaf extract (AMLE).

Treatment
AMPEe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
AMLEe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COCOYAM YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicate that the AMPE gave better yield than AMLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All moringa extract treatments gave higher cocoyam yield than the control.

Treatment
aqueous moringa extract (leaf and pod)e0
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Umudike, Abia Statee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COCOYAM YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The use of aqueous moringa extract (leaf and pod) as a foliar fertilizer was studied in the cocoyam research farm,National Root Crop Research Institute, Umudike, Abia State”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172 · show in text ↑
e2

“When compared with the control,all the treatments gave higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMPE 2:1 gave about 20% higher cocoyam yield than the control on cultivar NCe 012.

Material
NCe 012e3
Treatment
AMPE 2:1e3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
about 20%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COCOYAM YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“When compared with the control,all the treatments gave higher yield, with AMPE 2:1 having higher yield of about 20% on NCe 012 and AMPE 1:1with about 50% on NCe 001”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMPE 1:1 gave about 50% higher cocoyam yield than the control on cultivar NCe 001.

Material
NCe 001e3
Treatment
AMPE 1:1e3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
about 50%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COCOYAM YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“When compared with the control,all the treatments gave higher yield, with AMPE 2:1 having higher yield of about 20% on NCe 012 and AMPE 1:1with about 50% on NCe 001”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differed significantly between the two cocoyam cultivars, with NCe 012 performing better.

Material
NCe 012e4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
better performancee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COCOYAM YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“Amongst the two cultivars, there were significant differences in their yield, withbetter performance from NCe 012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1225 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend moringa extract as a good organic foliar fertilizer for enhanced cocoyam yield.

Treatment
moringa extracte5
Outcome
enhanced yielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COCOYAM YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Results showed that moringa extract can be considered as a good organicfoliar fertilizer for enhanced yield of Cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1345 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the yield-enhancing effect of moringa extract to its growth hormones.

Compound
growth hormonese6
Outcome
enhanced yielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COCOYAM YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“Results showed that moringa extract can be considered as a good organicfoliar fertilizer for enhanced yield of Cocoyam. This is attributed to its composition of growth hormones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1403 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Colocasia esculenta (taro)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.