Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology

Integrated Weed Management in Chickpea

V. S. Hooda; Satyajeet Ashok Yadav

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

) and also to the weed free conditions. In chickpea, the PPI application of pendimethalin was superior over PRE application, however there was no significant differences in yield. Weeds allowed to grow through the crop season reduced the seed yield of chickpea to the extent of 31.29 and 25.49 % during 2011-12 and 2012-13, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PPI pendimethalin was superior to PRE application, although yield did not differ significantly.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
PPI application of pendimethaline0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
PRE applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In chickpea, the PPI application of pendimethalin was superior over PRE application, however there was no significant differences in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weeds reduced chickpea seed yield by 31.29% in 2011-12.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Weeds allowed to grow through the crop seasone0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
31.29e0
Setting
2011-12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds allowed to grow through the crop season reduced the seed yield of chickpea to the extent of 31.29 and 25.49 % during 2011-12 and 2012-13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weeds reduced chickpea seed yield by 25.49% in 2012-13.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Weeds allowed to grow through the crop seasone0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
25.49 %e0
Setting
2012-13e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds allowed to grow through the crop season reduced the seed yield of chickpea to the extent of 31.29 and 25.49 % during 2011-12 and 2012-13, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–336 · show in text ↑

climate site · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.