Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

The Dependence of Crop Potatoes on the Level of Irrigation under Polish Conditions

Piotr Pszczółkowski; Barbara Sawicka; Tomasz Lenartowicz; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the dependence of potato crops on the level of irrigation in three mesoregions of Poland. The field experiments were carried out in 2009–2011 according to an obligatory methodology for evaluation of crop cultivars. Three factors were tested: two cultivation practices (with irrigation and without irrigation as control), five potato cultivars, and three locations (Masłowice, Szczecin-Dąbie, and Węgrzce). The study was conducted in randomized blocks in triplicate. The study included the same nutrition across locations and protection against potato blight. Irrigation was applied according to the criterion of optimal soil moisture at a humidity decrease below 70% of the field water capacity. At the time of harvest, total and commercial yields of tubers were determined. Detailed analysis of the dependent variables, total and marketable yield, and the independent variables for the second harvest date, confirmed confidence in the achieved results. The coefficients of variation for total and marketable yield, on the second harvest date, were 23% and 25%, respectively, which means high stability for the results. Irrigation of potato plantations contributed to an increase in the total yield of tubers in the first harvest term by 3.22 t·ha−1 and by 7.23 t·ha−1 -in the second term; and the commercial yield of tubers by 3.45 t·ha−1 in the first term and by 7.42 t·ha−1 -in the second term of tuber harvest. The highest watering efficiency in the first harvest time, 60 days after planting, was distinguished by the “Miłek” variety, and in the second harvest date by the “Denar” variety.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased the total tuber yield of potato at the first harvest by 3.22 t/ha.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
total yield of tuberse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.22 t·ha−1e0
Qualifier
first harvest terme0
Comparator
without irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of potato plantations contributed to an increase in the total yield of tubers in the first harvest term by 3.22 t·ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1286 · show in text ↑
e1

“without irrigation as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased the total tuber yield of potato at the second harvest by 7.23 t/ha.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
total yield of tuberse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.23 t·ha−1e2
Qualifier
second terme2
Comparator
without irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of potato plantations contributed to an increase in the total yield of tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“without irrigation as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–355 · show in text ↑
e2

“by 7.23 t·ha−1 -in the second term”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased the commercial tuber yield of potato at the first harvest by 3.45 t/ha.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
commercial yield of tuberse2
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.45 t·ha−1e2
Qualifier
first terme2
Comparator
without irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of potato plantations contributed to an increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“without irrigation as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–355 · show in text ↑
e2

“the commercial yield of tubers by 3.45 t·ha−1 in the first term”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased the commercial tuber yield of potato at the second harvest by 7.42 t/ha.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
commercial yield of tuberse2
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.42 t·ha−1e2
Qualifier
second term of tuber harveste2
Comparator
without irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of potato plantations contributed to an increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“without irrigation as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–355 · show in text ↑
e2

“the commercial yield of tubers by 3.45 t·ha−1 in the first term and by 7.42 t·ha−1 -in the second term of tuber harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest watering efficiency at the first harvest (60 days after planting) was obtained by the Miłek cultivar.

Taxon
PotatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Material
Miłeke0
Outcome
highest watering efficiencye0
Qualifier
first harvest time, 60 days after plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest watering efficiency in the first harvest time, 60 days after planting, was distinguished by the “Miłek” variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest watering efficiency at the second harvest date was obtained by the Denar cultivar.

Taxon
PotatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Material
Denare1
Outcome
highest watering efficiencye0
Qualifier
second harvest datee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest watering efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1483 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the second harvest date by the “Denar” variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–31 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.