Abstract
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan) conducted 250 frontline demonstrations on chickpea variety GNG-1958 (Marudhar) over an area of 100 hectares during rabi season of 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20. The results of the demonstrations revealed that on an average seed yield of chickpea under improved technology ranged from 17.85 to 19.57 q/ha with a mean of 18.52 q/ha which was 15.33 per cent more yield as compared to local check. Moreover, the seed yield also recorded substantially higher under demonstration (18.52 q/ha) over district average (11.73 q/ha) and state average (11.02 q/ha). Further, findings of the study revealed that from one hectare average additional yield 2.57 q/ha, net monetary return ₹47565/ha, additional returns ₹10404/ha, effective gain ₹8289/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.65 were obtained under improved technology as compared to farmers’ practice. The average technology gap (5.48 q/ha), extension gap (2.57q/ha) and technology index (22.82%) were found.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Improved technology yielded 18.52 q/ha on average, 15.33 per cent more than the local check.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- improved technologye0
- Outcome
- seed yield of chickpeae0
- Direction
- more yielde0
- Value
- 15.33 per cente0
- Qualifier
- 17.85 to 19.57 q/ha with a mean of 18.52 q/hae0
- Comparator
- local checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results of the demonstrations revealed that on an average seed yield of chickpea under improved technology ranged from 17.85 to 19.57 q/ha with a mean of 18.52 q/ha which was 15.33 per cent more yield as compared to local check.”
Claim · model-written summary
Demonstration seed yield exceeded the district average.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 18.52 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 11.73 q/hae0
- Comparator
- district averagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the seed yield also recorded substantially higher under demonstration (18.52 q/ha) over district average (11.73 q/ha)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Demonstration seed yield exceeded the state average.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 18.52 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 11.02 q/hae0
- Comparator
- state averagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the seed yield also recorded substantially higher under demonstration (18.52 q/ha) over district average (11.73 q/ha) and state average (11.02 q/ha)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved technology produced an average additional yield of 2.57 q/ha per hectare.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- improved technologye0
- Outcome
- additional yielde0
- Direction
- additionale0
- Value
- 2.57 q/hae0
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from one hectare average additional yield 2.57 q/ha, net monetary return ₹47565/ha, additional returns ₹10404/ha, effective gain ₹8289/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.65 were obtained under improved technology as compared to farmers’ practice”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved technology produced net monetary return of ₹47565/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- net monetary returne0
- Value
- ₹47565/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net monetary return ₹47565/ha”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved technology produced additional returns of ₹10404/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- improved technologye0
- Outcome
- additional returnse0
- Direction
- additionale0
- Value
- ₹10404/hae0
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“additional returns ₹10404/ha, effective gain ₹8289/ha and benefit: cost ratio 2.65 were obtained under improved technology as compared to farmers’ practice”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved technology produced effective gain of ₹8289/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- effective gaine0
- Value
- ₹8289/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effective gain ₹8289/ha”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved technology had a benefit: cost ratio of 2.65.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe0
- Value
- 2.65e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benefit: cost ratio 2.65”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Average technology gap was 5.48 q/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- technology gape0
- Value
- 5.48 q/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average technology gap (5.48 q/ha)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Average extension gap was 2.57q/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- extension gape0
- Value
- 2.57q/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“extension gap (2.57q/ha)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Technology index was 22.82%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- technology indexe0
- Value
- 22.82%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“technology index (22.82%)”
t0“chickpea”