Abstract
Stochastic dominance, stochastic dominance with respect to a function, and stochastic efficiency with respect to a function are used to compare late blight management strategies between a calendar spray schedule and a spray schedule recommended by Potato/Tomato Late Blight Decision Support System (DSS). Results show that the DSS recommended spray schedule is a more effective management strategy for controlling late blight in terms of disease control, net income over fungicide cost, and risk-adjusted net income. The value added by DSS ranges from $30 to $544 per acre. Our research contributes to the literature by providing a method to evaluate the economic benefits of adopting DSS.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
The DSS-recommended spray schedule was more effective than the calendar spray schedule for controlling potato late blight in disease control, net income over fungicide cost and risk-adjusted net income
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- DSS recommended spray schedulee1
- Interactor
- late blighte1pathogen
- Outcome
- disease control, net income over fungicide cost, and risk-adjusted net incomee1
- Direction
- more effectivee1
- Comparator
- calendar spray schedulee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“potato precision farming technology”
e0“compare late blight management strategies between a calendar spray schedule and a spray schedule recommended by Potato/Tomato Late Blight Decision Support System (DSS)”
e1“the DSS recommended spray schedule is a more effective management strategy for controlling late blight in terms of disease control, net income over fungicide cost, and risk-adjusted net income”
Claim · model-written summary
The value added by DSS ranges from 30 to 544 dollars per acre
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
- Outcome
- value added by DSSe2
- Value
- $30 to $544 per acree2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“potato precision farming technology”
e2“The value added by DSS ranges from $30 to $544 per acre”
The same questions in other papers
application · control · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.