Abstract
Background: Fig belongs to tropical and subtropical climates, and Haripur district being a subtropical area have great potential for successful commercial cultivation of figs. The most common method of fig propagation is by hardwood cutting, which is an easy and economical way of propagation. But lack of knowledge regarding suitable date of cutting collection and sowing and selection of appropriate potting medium severely limits the production of fig on a commercial scale. Objectives: Current study was undertaken in order to identify suitable collecting dates of fig cuttings and to develop a suitable potting media for the successful establishment of fig cutting. Methodology: The study was comprised of four different potting media i.e. Soil, Farmyard or Manure (FYM), Compost, Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1) and cuttings of fig cultivar Sawari were collected and sown on two different dates i.e. 1st January and 15th January in polyethene bags of uniform size. The experiment was laid in Complete Randomized Design (CRD). Results: Results revealed that maximum Length of the root (9.8 cm), Shoot thickness (1.4 cm) and Number of leaves (4.1) were noted in FYM, whereas maximum days to Sprouting (18.5) and Survival percentage (82.3%) were noted in Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1). Whereas fig cutting sown on 15th January showed maximum Days to sprouting (18.8), Length of the root (9.4 cm), Survival percentage (87.1%), Shoot thickness (1.8cm) and Number of leaves (4.6). Conclusion: It can be concluded that FYM and 15th January showed highest values of studied parameters.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in FYM had the maximum Length of the root (9.8 cm).
- Taxon
- Ficus Carica
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=60)
Ficus caricat0 - Treatment
- FYMe0
- Outcome
- Length of the roote0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 9.8 cme0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that maximum Length of the root (9.8 cm), Shoot thickness (1.4 cm) and Number of leaves (4.1) were noted in FYM, whereas maximum days to Sprouting (18.5) and Survival percentage (82.3%) were noted in Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in FYM had the maximum Shoot thickness (1.4 cm).
- Taxon
- Ficus CaricaFicus caricat0
- Treatment
- FYMe0
- Outcome
- Shoot thicknesse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1.4 cme0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that maximum Length of the root (9.8 cm), Shoot thickness (1.4 cm) and Number of leaves (4.1) were noted in FYM, whereas maximum days to Sprouting (18.5) and Survival percentage (82.3%) were noted in Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in FYM had the maximum Number of leaves (4.1).
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that maximum Length of the root (9.8 cm), Shoot thickness (1.4 cm) and Number of leaves (4.1) were noted in FYM, whereas maximum days to Sprouting (18.5) and Survival percentage (82.3%) were noted in Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1) had the maximum days to Sprouting (18.5).
- Taxon
- Ficus CaricaFicus caricat0
- Treatment
- Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1)e0
- Outcome
- days to Sproutinge0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 18.5e0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that maximum Length of the root (9.8 cm), Shoot thickness (1.4 cm) and Number of leaves (4.1) were noted in FYM, whereas maximum days to Sprouting (18.5) and Survival percentage (82.3%) were noted in Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1) had the maximum Survival percentage (82.3%).
- Taxon
- Ficus CaricaFicus caricat0
- Treatment
- Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1)e0
- Outcome
- Survival percentagee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 82.3%e0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that maximum Length of the root (9.8 cm), Shoot thickness (1.4 cm) and Number of leaves (4.1) were noted in FYM, whereas maximum days to Sprouting (18.5) and Survival percentage (82.3%) were noted in Soil+FYM+Compost (1:1:1).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in 15th January had the maximum Days to sprouting (18.8).
- Taxon
- Ficus CaricaFicus caricat0
- Treatment
- 15th Januarye0
- Outcome
- Days to sproutinge0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 18.8e0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Whereas fig cutting sown on 15th January showed maximum Days to sprouting (18.8), Length of the root (9.4 cm), Survival percentage (87.1%), Shoot thickness (1.8cm) and Number of leaves (4.6).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in 15th January had the maximum Length of the root (9.4 cm).
- Taxon
- Ficus CaricaFicus caricat0
- Treatment
- 15th Januarye0
- Outcome
- Length of the roote0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 9.4 cme0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Whereas fig cutting sown on 15th January showed maximum Days to sprouting (18.8), Length of the root (9.4 cm), Survival percentage (87.1%), Shoot thickness (1.8cm) and Number of leaves (4.6).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in 15th January had the maximum Survival percentage (87.1%).
- Taxon
- Ficus CaricaFicus caricat0
- Treatment
- 15th Januarye0
- Outcome
- Survival percentagee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 87.1%e0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Whereas fig cutting sown on 15th January showed maximum Days to sprouting (18.8), Length of the root (9.4 cm), Survival percentage (87.1%), Shoot thickness (1.8cm) and Number of leaves (4.6).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in 15th January had the maximum Shoot thickness (1.8cm).
- Taxon
- Ficus CaricaFicus caricat0
- Treatment
- 15th Januarye0
- Outcome
- Shoot thicknesse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1.8cme0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Whereas fig cutting sown on 15th January showed maximum Days to sprouting (18.8), Length of the root (9.4 cm), Survival percentage (87.1%), Shoot thickness (1.8cm) and Number of leaves (4.6).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fig cuttings in 15th January had the maximum Number of leaves (4.6).
- Taxon
- Ficus CaricaFicus caricat0
- Treatment
- 15th Januarye0
- Outcome
- Number of leavese0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 4.6e0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Whereas fig cutting sown on 15th January showed maximum Days to sprouting (18.8), Length of the root (9.4 cm), Survival percentage (87.1%), Shoot thickness (1.8cm) and Number of leaves (4.6).”
t0“Fig Cuttings (Ficus Carica)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →fertilization · survival · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.