Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Crop Rotation Enhances Agricultural Sustainability: From an Empirical Evaluation of Eco-Economic Benefits in Rice Production

Dun-Chun He; Yan-Li Ma; Zhuan-Zhuan Li; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
54
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cropping systems greatly impact the productivity and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. However, we often lack an understanding of the quantitative interactions among social, economic and ecological components in each of the systems, especially with regard to crop rotation. Current production systems cannot guarantee both high profits in the short term and social and ecological benefits in the long term. This study combined statistic and economic models to evaluate the comprehensive effects of cropping systems on rice production using data collected from experimental fields between 2017 and 2018. The results showed that increasing agricultural diversity through rotations, particularly potato–rice rotation (PR), significantly increased the social, economic and ecological benefits of rice production. Yields, profits, profit margins, weighted dimensionless values of soil chemical and physical (SCP) and heavy metal (SHM) traits, benefits and externalities generated by PR and other rotations were generally higher than successive rice cropping. This suggests that agricultural diversity through rotations, particularly PR rotation, is worth implementing due to its overall benefits generated in rice production. However, due to various nutrient residues from preceding crops, fertilizer application should be rationalized to improve the resource and investment efficiency. Furthermore, we internalized the externalities (hidden ecological and social benefits/costs) generated by each of the rotation systems and proposed ways of incenting farmers to adopt crop rotation approaches for sustainable rice production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato–rice rotation significantly increased social, economic and ecological benefits of rice production.

Treatment
potato–rice rotation (PR)e0
Outcome
social, economic and ecological benefitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rotations, particularly potato–rice rotation (PR), significantly increased the social, economic and ecological benefits of rice production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotations generally had higher rice yields than successive rice cropping.

Treatment
PR and other rotationse0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
successive rice croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields, profits, profit margins, weighted dimensionless values of soil chemical and physical (SCP) and heavy metal (SHM) traits, benefits and externalities generated by PR and other rotations were generally higher than successive rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotations generally had higher profits and profit margins than successive rice cropping.

Treatment
PR and other rotationse0
Outcome
profits, profit marginse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
successive rice croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields, profits, profit margins, weighted dimensionless values of soil chemical and physical (SCP) and heavy metal (SHM) traits, benefits and externalities generated by PR and other rotations were generally higher than successive rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotations generally had higher soil chemical and physical trait values than successive rice cropping.

Treatment
PR and other rotationse0
Outcome
weighted dimensionless values of soil chemical and physical (SCP)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
successive rice croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weighted dimensionless values of soil chemical and physical (SCP) and heavy metal (SHM) traits, benefits and externalities generated by PR and other rotations were generally higher than successive rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotations generally had higher soil heavy metal trait values than successive rice cropping.

Treatment
PR and other rotationse0
Outcome
heavy metal (SHM) traitse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
successive rice croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heavy metal (SHM) traits, benefits and externalities generated by PR and other rotations were generally higher than successive rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotations generally generated higher benefits and externalities than successive rice cropping.

Treatment
PR and other rotationse0
Outcome
benefits and externalitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
successive rice croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefits and externalities generated by PR and other rotations were generally higher than successive rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend implementing rotations, particularly potato–rice rotation.

Outcome
PR rotation, is worth implementinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agricultural diversity through rotations, particularly PR rotation, is worth implementing due to its overall benefits generated in rice production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1224 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend rationalizing fertilizer use because of nutrient residues from preceding crops.

Outcome
fertilizer application should be rationalizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“due to various nutrient residues from preceding crops, fertilizer application should be rationalized to improve the resource and investment efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose incentives for farmers to adopt crop rotation.

Outcome
incenting farmers to adopt crop rotation approachese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proposed ways of incenting farmers to adopt crop rotation approaches for sustainable rice production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1626 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 72 positive, 14 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.