Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Response of Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Deficit Irrigation Management under the Semi-Arid Environment of Egypt: Field and Modeling Study

Samiha Ouda; Tahany Noreldin; Juan José Alarcón; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In many areas of the world, water shortages prevail and threaten food production. Deficit irrigation was commonly investigated in dry areas as a precious and sustainable production approach. Using the CropSyst model to simulate the effects of different deficit irrigation treatments could help draw conclusions and save time, effort, and money. Therefore, the aims of this research were (i) to calibrate and validate the CropSyst model for wheat under different sustained and phenological stage-based deficit irrigation treatments, (ii) to simulate the impacts of the latter treatments on limiting wheat yield reduction. Two field experiments were conducted in Nubaria (Egypt), representing an arid environment. They included seven irrigation treatments: (1) 100%, (2) 75%, or (3) 50% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) during the whole crop cycle; (4) 50% ETc at tillering only, or (5) at booting only, or (6) at grain filling only, or (7) at both tillering and grain filling, with the replenishment of 100% ETc to the treatments (4) to (7) in the remaining phenological stages. The results revealed that phenological stage-based deficit irrigation of wheat resulted in lower yield reduction compared to sustained deficit irrigation treatments, with a 6% yield reduction when 50% ETc was applied at the booting stage. Wheat yield loss was reduced to 4 or 6% when 95 or 90% of ETc were applied, respectively. The CropSyst model accurately simulated wheat grain and total dry matter under deficit irrigation with low RMSE value. In conclusion, the CropSyst model can be reliably used for evaluating the strategy of planned deficit irrigation management in terms of wheat production under the arid environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stage-based deficit irrigation caused less wheat yield loss than sustained deficit irrigation.

Treatment
phenological stage-based deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sustained deficit irrigation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phenological stage-based deficit irrigation of wheat resulted in lower yield reduction compared to sustained deficit irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half ETc at booting caused a 6% wheat yield reduction.

Treatment
50% ETc was applied at the booting stagee0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a 6% yield reduction when 50% ETc was applied at the booting stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 95% ETc, wheat yield loss was 4%.

Treatment
95 or 90% of ETce0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4 or 6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield loss was reduced to 4 or 6% when 95 or 90% of ETc were applied, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90% ETc, wheat yield loss was 6%.

Treatment
95 or 90% of ETce0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4 or 6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield loss was reduced to 4 or 6% when 95 or 90% of ETc were applied, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1406 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CropSyst accurately simulated wheat grain yield under deficit irrigation.

Outcome
wheat graine0
Value
low RMSE valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CropSyst model accurately simulated wheat grain and total dry matter under deficit irrigation with low RMSE value.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CropSyst accurately simulated total wheat dry matter under deficit irrigation.

Outcome
total dry mattere0
Value
low RMSE valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CropSyst model accurately simulated wheat grain and total dry matter under deficit irrigation with low RMSE value.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.