Paper · 2021 · Environmental and Sustainability Indicators

Impact of variable tillage based residue management and legume based cropping for seven years on enzymes activity, soil quality index and crop productivity in rice ecology

C.P. Nath; Narendra Kumar; K. Das; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
36
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.) – wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) sequence has been witnessed as an unsustainable practice in rice based cropping system. Climate resilient agro-techniques consisting with principles of risk mitigation and adaptation for sustainable agriculture such as zero tillage (ZT) is being adopted in south Asian countries. However, long–term impact of sequential ZT ​+ ​residues addition in crop rotation after puddled rice (CT–ZT ​+ ​R) on soil enzymes activity and soil quality index (SQI) are not adequately addressed. Experiment was conducted in split-plot design having four crop establishment techniques: (i) CT in each crop of rotation without residue (CT–CT), (ii) CT in each crop with incorporated residue (CT–CT ​+ ​R), (iii) CT rice – ZT in post–rainy season crops without residue (CT–ZT), (iv) CT rice – ZT in post–rainy season crops with surface residue mulch (CT–ZT ​+ ​R) each with three levels of crop rotations: (i) rice–wheat (R–W), (ii) rice–chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (R–C) and (iii) rice–chickpea–mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) (R–C–Mb). CT–ZT ​+ ​R enhanced 25% soil organic carbon (SOC) and 45% microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) over CT–CT (P ​< ​0.05). Further, CT–ZT ​+ ​R increased SMBC/SOC ratio by 31.4 and 16.7% (P ​< ​0.05) over CT–CT, respectively. For SOC, SMBC and SMBC/SOC ratio, an order of R–C–Mb ​> ​R–C ​> ​R–W (P ​< ​0.05) was observed. CT–ZT ​+ ​R increased (P ​< ​0.05) fluorescein diacetate activity by 17–31%, alkaline phosphatase by 4–25% and acid phosphatase by 16–31% over CT–CT ​+ ​R and CT–CT. ZT in post–rainy season (CT–ZT ​+ ​R) resulted in 21–37% higher β-glucosidase and 25–31% protease activity than those of continuous CT. The interaction revealed that CT–ZT ​+ ​R under R–C–Mb and R–C rotations increased (P ​< ​0.05) 26% and 10% rice grain yield compared with CT–CT x R–W system, respectively. The SMBC had higher share (86–90%) towards SQI values followed by fluorescein diacetate (10–14%) and emerged as soil quality indicators in long–run. CT–ZT ​+ ​R and CT–ZT increased 40% SQI values compared with CT–CT. Besides, R–C–Mb and R–C rotations had 13–35% higher SQI over R–W (P ​< ​0.05). Thus, elimination of intensive tillage at least in post–rainy seasons after puddled rice with crop residues retention and cropping intensification with grain legumes can bring about higher rice productivity and soil quality in rice based ecologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT–ZT with residue enhanced soil organic carbon by 25% over CT–CT.

Treatment
CT–ZT ​+ ​Re1
Outcome
soil organic carbone1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
25%e1
Comparator
CT–CTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“CT–ZT ​+ ​R enhanced 25% soil organic carbon (SOC) and 45% microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) over CT–CT (P ​< ​0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT–ZT with residue enhanced microbial biomass carbon by 45% over CT–CT.

Treatment
CT–ZT ​+ ​Re1
Outcome
microbial biomass carbone1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
45%e1
Comparator
CT–CTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“CT–ZT ​+ ​R enhanced 25% soil organic carbon (SOC) and 45% microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) over CT–CT (P ​< ​0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT–ZT with residue increased the SMBC/SOC ratio by 31.4 and 16.7% over CT–CT.

Treatment
CT–ZT ​+ ​Re2
Outcome
SMBC/SOC ratioe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
31.4 and 16.7%e2
Qualifier
respectivelye2
Comparator
CT–CTe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“Further, CT–ZT ​+ ​R increased SMBC/SOC ratio by 31.4 and 16.7% (P ​< ​0.05) over CT–CT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT–ZT with residue increased fluorescein diacetate activity by 17–31% over CT–CT with residue and CT–CT.

Treatment
CT–ZT ​+ ​Re3
Outcome
fluorescein diacetate activitye3
Direction
increasede3
Value
17–31%e3
Comparator
CT–CT ​+ ​R and CT–CTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“CT–ZT ​+ ​R increased (P ​< ​0.05) fluorescein diacetate activity by 17–31%, alkaline phosphatase by 4–25% and acid phosphatase by 16–31% over CT–CT ​+ ​R and CT–CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT–ZT with residue increased alkaline phosphatase activity by 4–25% over CT–CT with residue and CT–CT.

Treatment
CT–ZT ​+ ​Re3
Outcome
alkaline phosphatasee3
Direction
increasede3
Value
4–25%e3
Comparator
CT–CT ​+ ​R and CT–CTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“CT–ZT ​+ ​R increased (P ​< ​0.05) fluorescein diacetate activity by 17–31%, alkaline phosphatase by 4–25% and acid phosphatase by 16–31% over CT–CT ​+ ​R and CT–CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT–ZT with residue increased acid phosphatase activity by 16–31% over CT–CT with residue and CT–CT.

Treatment
CT–ZT ​+ ​Re3
Outcome
acid phosphatasee3
Direction
increasede3
Value
16–31%e3
Comparator
CT–CT ​+ ​R and CT–CTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“CT–ZT ​+ ​R increased (P ​< ​0.05) fluorescein diacetate activity by 17–31%, alkaline phosphatase by 4–25% and acid phosphatase by 16–31% over CT–CT ​+ ​R and CT–CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage in the post-rainy season with residue increased β-glucosidase activity by 21–37% over continuous tillage.

Treatment
ZT in post–rainy season (CT–ZT ​+ ​R)e5
Outcome
β-glucosidasee5
Direction
highere5
Value
21–37%e5
Comparator
continuous CTe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e5

“ZT in post–rainy season (CT–ZT ​+ ​R) resulted in 21–37% higher β-glucosidase and 25–31% protease activity than those of continuous CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage in the post-rainy season with residue increased protease activity by 25–31% over continuous tillage.

Treatment
ZT in post–rainy season (CT–ZT ​+ ​R)e5
Outcome
protease activitye5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
25–31%e5
Comparator
continuous CTe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e5

“ZT in post–rainy season (CT–ZT ​+ ​R) resulted in 21–37% higher β-glucosidase and 25–31% protease activity than those of continuous CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT–ZT with residue under the R–C–Mb rotation increased rice grain yield by 26% over CT–CT under R–W.

Treatment
CT–ZT ​+ ​R under R–C–Mbe6
Outcome
rice grain yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Value
26%e6
Comparator
CT–CT x R–W systeme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e6

“The interaction revealed that CT–ZT ​+ ​R under R–C–Mb and R–C rotations increased (P ​< ​0.05) 26% and 10% rice grain yield compared with CT–CT x R–W system, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT–ZT with residue under the R–C rotation increased rice grain yield by 10% over CT–CT under R–W.

Treatment
CT–ZT ​+ ​R under R–Ce6
Outcome
rice grain yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Value
10%e6
Comparator
CT–CT x R–W systeme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e6

“The interaction revealed that CT–ZT ​+ ​R under R–C–Mb and R–C rotations increased (P ​< ​0.05) 26% and 10% rice grain yield compared with CT–CT x R–W system, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT–ZT and CT–ZT with residue increased soil quality index by 40% over CT–CT.

Treatment
CT–ZT ​+ ​R and CT–ZTe7
Outcome
SQI valuese7
Direction
increasede7
Value
40%e7
Comparator
CT–CTe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e7

“CT–ZT ​+ ​R and CT–ZT increased 40% SQI values compared with CT–CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2095–2161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R–C–Mb and R–C rotations increased soil quality index by 13–35% over R–W.

Treatment
R–C–Mb and R–C rotationse1
Outcome
SQIe1
Direction
highere1
Value
13–35%e1
Comparator
R–We1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“R–C–Mb and R–C rotations had 13–35% higher SQI over R–W”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2172–2227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMBC had the largest share, 86–90%, of the soil quality index values.

Outcome
SQI valuese1
Value
86–90%e1
Qualifier
SMBCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage (CT) with excessive soil disturbance and crop residue removal in rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“The SMBC had higher share (86–90%) towards SQI values followed by fluorescein diacetate (10–14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2042 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Eliminating intensive tillage after puddled rice with residue retention and legume intensification is recommended for higher rice productivity and soil quality.

Outcome
higher rice productivity and soil qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Thus, elimination of intensive tillage at least in post–rainy seasons after puddled rice with crop residues retention and cropping intensification with grain legumes can bring about higher rice productivity and soil quality in rice based ecologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2242–2489 · show in text ↑