Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Evaluating Efficacy of High Density Planting in Banana under Coastal Plain Zone of Odisha

Saudamini Swain; Bipin Pradhan; Prakash Patil

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

In the present investigation an attempt has been made to study the effect of high density planting on growth and yield of banana (cv. Bantal, culinary type & cv. Grand Naine, dessert type) in coastal plain zone of Odisha. The investigation was conducted taking six treatments (2 varieties and 3 spacings: 2 m x 3 m with 3 suckers/pit; 1.8 m x 3.6 m with 3 suckers/pit; 1.8 m x 1.8 m with 1 sucker/pit) in a randomised block design with four replications during the year 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17. Observations were recorded on growth parameters and bunch yield. Pooled data over three years indicated that all high density planting treatments had higher pseudo-stem height than the control. The plant girth decreased with increase in number of q per hill. Number of leaves/plant increased in all the high density planting (HDP) treatments. All the HDP treatments recorded reduced bunch weight and hands per bunch but higher yield. Pooled analysis revealed that planting of 3 suckers per pit at 2 m × 3 m spacing recorded the highest yield for both the cultivars under coastal plain zone of Odisha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All high density planting treatments increased banana pseudo-stem height over control.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
high density planting treatmentse0
Outcome
pseudo-stem heighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“all high density planting treatments had higher pseudo-stem height than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant girth decreased with more plants per hill.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
number of q per hille0
Outcome
plant girthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“The plant girth decreased with increase in number of q per hill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density planting increased leaves per plant.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
high density planting (HDP) treatmentse0
Outcome
Number of leaves/plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Number of leaves/plant increased in all the high density planting (HDP) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density planting reduced bunch weight and hands per bunch.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
HDP treatmentse0
Outcome
bunch weight and hands per bunche0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All the HDP treatments recorded reduced bunch weight and hands per bunch but higher yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High density planting increased yield.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
HDP treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All the HDP treatments recorded reduced bunch weight and hands per bunch but higher yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three suckers per pit at 2 m × 3 m had the highest yield for both cultivars.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
3 suckers per pit at 2 m × 3 m spacinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
coastal plain zone of Odishae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting of 3 suckers per pit at 2 m × 3 m spacing recorded the highest yield for both the cultivars under coastal plain zone of Odisha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑

density · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.