Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Genetic Divergence Analysis in Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

Navreet Kaur Rai; A. K. Sharma; A. K. Parihar; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Thirty cowpea genotypes were investigated to analyse the genetic divergence for twelve characters. These genotypes were clustered into 8 distinct groups using Mahalanobis D2 statistic and Tocher's method. Cluster I and cluster II were the largest comprised of 12 genotypes each. Cluster III, IV, V, VI, VII and VIII were monogenotypic indicating wide diversity from the rest and also from each other. The maximum intra cluster D2 value was observed within cluster II followed by cluster I suggesting that genotypes present in these clusters might have different genetical constitution. The highest inter cluster distance was registered between cluster II and cluster III followed by cluster II and cluster V and cluster II and cluster IV indicating wide divergence among these clusters. The crossing among the genotypes of these divergent clusters could be used in hybrid development programme of cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty cowpea genotypes were clustered into eight groups.

Material
cowpea genotypese0
Outcome
8 distinct groupse0
Value
8 distinct groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thirty cowpea genotypes were investigated to analyse the genetic divergence for twelve characters. These genotypes were clustered into 8 distinct groups using Mahalanobis D2 statistic and Tocher's method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–203 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clusters I and II were the largest, each with twelve cowpea genotypes.

Outcome
largeste0
Value
12 genotypes eache0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster I and cluster II were the largest comprised of 12 genotypes each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea clusters III through VIII each contained one genotype, indicating divergence.

Outcome
monogenotypice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster III, IV, V, VI, VII and VIII were monogenotypic indicating wide diversity from the rest and also from each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea cluster II had the maximum within-cluster D2 value, followed by cluster I.

Outcome
intra cluster D2 valuee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum intra cluster D2 value was observed within cluster II followed by cluster I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest cowpea inter-cluster distance was between clusters II and III, followed by II and V and II and IV.

Outcome
inter cluster distancee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest inter cluster distance was registered between cluster II and cluster III followed by cluster II and cluster V and cluster II and cluster IV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest crossing genotypes from divergent cowpea clusters for hybrid development.

Outcome
crossing among the genotypes of these divergent clusterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crossing among the genotypes of these divergent clusters could be used in hybrid development programme of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–903 · show in text ↑