Paper · 2021 · Bangladesh Agronomy Journal

Influence of Organic Manures on Drought Stress at Different Growth Stages of Wheat

AKMR Amin; MA Baque

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted in the net house of the Agronomy department, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka during the period from November, 2018 to March, 2019 to evaluate the suitable organic source to mitigate the drought stress impact on wheat. The experiment comprised two factors viz. factor A: Three levels of organic manures, i) O0 = Control (Without organic manure), ii) O1 = Cowdung (10 t/ha), iii) O2 = Poultry litter (5 t/ha), and factor B: four levels of drought i) D0 = Control (without drought), ii) D1 = Crown root initiation stage (at 20-29 DAS), iii) D2 = Booting stage (at 45-54 DAS), iv) D3 = Anthesis stage (at 55-64 DAS). The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design (factorial) with three replications. Organic manure showed positive impact on yield and cowdung (O1) gave the highest grain yield (4.06 g plant-1). This may be attributed to the highest number of effective tillers plant-1 (3.21), spike length (9.53 cm), spikelet spike-1 (17.31), grains spikelet-1 (2.31) and 1000-grain weight (44.61 g) of wheat in this treatment. In respect of drought imposition treatments, grain yield was found higher in control treatment (without imposition of drought) which was statistically similar with drought imposition at booting stage treatment (D2). These two treatments also showed highest number of effective tillers plant-1, spikelets spike-1, grains spike-1 and 1000-grain weight. Regarding the interaction of organic manure and drought, cowdung without drought imposition (O1D0) and cowdung with drought imposition at booting stage (O1D2) were highest yielder among the other interactions which was attributed to higher 1000-seed weight, number of effective tillers plant-1, spikelets spike-1 and grains spike-1. Results revealed that application of organic manure could reduce the impact of drought on wheat irrespective of growth stages. However, application of cowdung (10 t ha-1) was found more effective to combat drought impact at booting stage of wheat compared to other growth stages. Bangladesh Agron. J. 2020, 23(2): 81-86

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung produced the highest wheat grain yield, 4.06 g plant-1.

Treatment
cowdung (O1)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.06 g plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowdung (O1) gave the highest grain yield (4.06 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung yielded 3.21 effective tillers per plant.

Outcome
number of effective tillers plant-1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.21e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest number of effective tillers plant-1 (3.21)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung yielded 9.53 cm spike length.

Outcome
spike lengthe0
Value
9.53 cme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length (9.53 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung yielded 17.31 spikelets per spike.

Outcome
spikelet spike-1e0
Value
17.31e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikelet spike-1 (17.31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung yielded 2.31 grains per spikelet.

Outcome
grains spikelet-1e0
Value
2.31e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains spikelet-1 (2.31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung yielded 44.61 g 1000-grain weight.

Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Value
44.61 ge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grain weight (44.61 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No drought gave higher grain yield, statistically similar to drought imposed at booting.

Treatment
control treatment (without imposition of drought)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
drought imposition at booting stage treatment (D2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was found higher in control treatment (without imposition of drought) which was statistically similar with drought imposition at booting stage treatment (D2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No drought and booting-stage drought gave the highest effective tillers, spikelets, grains per spike and 1000-grain weight.

Outcome
number of effective tillers plant-1, spikelets spike-1, grains spike-1 and 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These two treatments also showed highest number of effective tillers plant-1, spikelets spike-1, grains spike-1 and 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung without drought was among the highest-yielding treatment combinations.

Treatment
cowdung without drought imposition (O1D0)e0
Outcome
highest yieldere0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowdung without drought imposition (O1D0) and cowdung with drought imposition at booting stage (O1D2) were highest yielder among the other interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung with booting-stage drought was among the highest-yielding combinations.

Treatment
cowdung with drought imposition at booting stage (O1D2)e0
Outcome
highest yieldere0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowdung with drought imposition at booting stage (O1D2) were highest yielder among the other interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high yield of the cowdung combinations was attributed to higher seed weight, tillers, spikelets and grains.

Outcome
higher 1000-seed weight, number of effective tillers plant-1, spikelets spike-1 and grains spike-1e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
attributed toe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was attributed to higher 1000-seed weight, number of effective tillers plant-1, spikelets spike-1 and grains spike-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure reduced drought effects on wheat across growth stages.

Treatment
application of organic manuree0
Outcome
impact of droughte0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of organic manure could reduce the impact of drought on wheat irrespective of growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowdung was most effective against drought at booting stage compared with other stages.

Treatment
application of cowdung (10 t ha-1)e0
Outcome
drought impacte0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
other growth stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of cowdung (10 t ha-1) was found more effective to combat drought impact at booting stage of wheat compared to other growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2046 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 537 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.