Paper · 2021 · Global Ecology and Conservation

Vascular epiphyte diversity and host tree architecture in two forest management types in the Himalaya

Yagya P. Adhikari; Samuel Hoffmann; Ripu M. Kunwar; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Epiphytes are one of the most diversified plant life forms, whose species richness peaks in the tropics and subtropics. Here we examined vertical distribution metrics (i.e., number of epiphyte individuals and epiphyte species richness) of vascular epiphytes (i.e., orchids and ferns) on two dominant host trees (i.e., Schima wallichii (DC.) Korth. and Quercus lanata Sm.) in sub-tropical forests of Nepal. We sampled a total number of 72 host trees of Q. lanata and S. wallichii from two forest sites: a government protected national park forest and community managed forest. We applied generalized linear mixed models and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests to explain epiphyte diversity by tree architecture (i.e., diameter at breast height, tree height, crown size, number of forks, bark rugosity, bark pH and tree layer), host species and forest management types. After variable selection via multi-model inference technique, we found diameter at breast height to be the most powerful and significant explanatory variable for the number of epiphyte individuals and epiphyte species richness across host tree species, tree layers, and forest management types. Interestingly, epiphyte diversity was on average higher in the community managed forest than in the national park forest, on S. wallichii than on Q. lanata and particularly on the trunk below forks. We conclude that effective conservation of epiphyte diversity in the Nepal Himalaya requires conservation of old-growth host trees through community approaches. If large and old tree stands are maintained, community managed forests can host high diversity of vascular epiphytes and provide ecosystem goods to local people alike.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Host tree diameter at breast height was the strongest significant explanatory variable for epiphyte abundance and species richness.

Taxon
epiphytee0
Outcome
number of epiphyte individuals and epiphyte species richnesse0
Qualifier
across host tree species, tree layers, and forest management typese0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Verbatim

e0

“diameter at breast height to be the most powerful and significant explanatory variable for the number of epiphyte individuals and epiphyte species richness across host tree species, tree layers, and forest management types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1155 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epiphyte diversity was higher in community managed forest than national park forest.

Taxon
epiphytee0
Outcome
epiphyte diversitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
national park foreste0
Setting
community managed foreste0

Verbatim

e0

“epiphyte diversity was on average higher in the community managed forest than in the national park forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1277 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epiphyte diversity was higher on Schima wallichii than Quercus lanata.

Taxon
epiphytet0
Interactor
S. wallichiiSchima wallichiie0host
Outcome
epiphyte diversitye1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Q. lanatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schima wallichii
Schima wallichii · InteractorWibowo Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on S. wallichii than on Q. lanata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vascular epiphyte diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“epiphyte diversity was on average higher in the community managed forest than in the national park forest, on S. wallichii than on Q. lanata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1312 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epiphyte diversity was particularly high on trunks below forks.

Taxon
epiphytet0
Organ / stage
trunk below forkse0
Outcome
epiphyte diversitye1
Direction
highere1

Verbatim

e0

“particularly on the trunk below forks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vascular epiphyte diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“epiphyte diversity was on average higher in the community managed forest than in the national park forest, on S. wallichii than on Q. lanata and particularly on the trunk below forks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1354 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend conserving old-growth host trees through community approaches to conserve epiphyte diversity.

Taxon
epiphytee0
Outcome
conservation of old-growth host trees through community approachese0
Setting
Nepal Himalayae0

Verbatim

e0

“effective conservation of epiphyte diversity in the Nepal Himalaya requires conservation of old-growth host trees through community approaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1515 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Maintained large and old stands may enable community forests to host diverse vascular epiphytes.

Taxon
vascular epiphytese0
Outcome
high diversity of vascular epiphytese0
Qualifier
If large and old tree stands are maintainede0
Setting
community managed forestse0

Verbatim

e0

“If large and old tree stands are maintained, community managed forests can host high diversity of vascular epiphytes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1633 · show in text ↑