Paper · 2012

Improving land and water productivity in basin rice cultivation in Kenya through System of Rice Intensification (SRI)

Odongo

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract: Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas rather than further expansion is more likely to be the main source of growth for the crop in Kenya, especially due to limited land and water resources. In order to achieve this, there is need to identify and adopt solutions that are environmentally more sustainable. That is, the production systems adopted should reduce water consumption and increase productivity. A study was carried out to evaluate whether the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) could increase water productivity and crop yield relative to the conventional production system of continuous flooding. The effects of SRI on total water use, growth characteristics and yield of three rice varieties were investigated at Mwea Irrigation Scheme of Kenya on vertic clay soils. The production practices of SRI were found to be beneficial to rice growth and yield. SRI gave higher average grain yield (14.85 t/ha) than the conventional flooded system (8.66 t/ha) at P=0.006, while the average yield across production systems was 15.89 t/ha, 11.26 t/ha and 8.10 t/ha for BW196, NERICA1 and Basmati370 varieties respectively, with P<0.001. There was a 24% saving in irrigation water by SRI, while land productivity (LP) and water productivity (WP) increased by 71% and 90% respectively compared to the conventional flooded system. Overall, SRI production system gave better yield and productivity results than the conventional flooded system. This was probably as a result of better phenotypic expressions due to the innovative soil-water-crop management practices of SRI that change the environment where rice is grown.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI gave higher average rice grain yield than the conventional flooded system at Mwea Irrigation Scheme.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
SRIe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
14.85 t/hae1
Qualifier
8.66 t/hae1
Comparator
conventional flooded systeme1
Setting
Mwea Irrigation Scheme of Kenyae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI gave higher average grain yield (14.85 t/ha) than the conventional flooded system (8.66 t/ha) at P=0.006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1019 · show in text ↑
e6

“Mwea Irrigation Scheme of Kenya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice variety BW196 averaged 15.89 t/ha yield across production systems.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L)Oryza sativae0
Material
BW196e2
Outcome
average yield across production systemse2
Value
15.89 t/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“the average yield across production systems was 15.89 t/ha, 11.26 t/ha and 8.10 t/ha for BW196, NERICA1 and Basmati370 varieties respectively, with P<0.001”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice variety NERICA1 averaged 11.26 t/ha yield across production systems.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L)Oryza sativae0
Material
NERICA1e2
Outcome
average yield across production systemse2
Value
11.26 t/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“the average yield across production systems was 15.89 t/ha, 11.26 t/ha and 8.10 t/ha for BW196, NERICA1 and Basmati370 varieties respectively, with P<0.001”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice variety Basmati370 averaged 8.10 t/ha yield across production systems.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L)Oryza sativae0
Material
Basmati370e2
Outcome
average yield across production systemse2
Value
8.10 t/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“the average yield across production systems was 15.89 t/ha, 11.26 t/ha and 8.10 t/ha for BW196, NERICA1 and Basmati370 varieties respectively, with P<0.001”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI saved 24% of irrigation water compared with the conventional flooded system.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
SRIe3
Outcome
irrigation watere3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
24%e3
Comparator
conventional flooded systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was a 24% saving in irrigation water by SRI, while land productivity (LP) and water productivity (WP) increased by 71% and 90% respectively compared to the conventional flooded system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased land productivity by 71% compared with the conventional flooded system.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
SRIe3
Outcome
land productivity (LP)e3
Direction
increasede3
Value
71%e3
Comparator
conventional flooded systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was a 24% saving in irrigation water by SRI, while land productivity (LP) and water productivity (WP) increased by 71% and 90% respectively compared to the conventional flooded system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased water productivity by 90% compared with the conventional flooded system.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
SRIe3
Outcome
water productivity (WP)e3
Direction
increasede3
Value
90%e3
Comparator
conventional flooded systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was a 24% saving in irrigation water by SRI, while land productivity (LP) and water productivity (WP) increased by 71% and 90% respectively compared to the conventional flooded system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The production practices of SRI were beneficial to rice growth and yield.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
production practices of SRIe4
Outcome
rice growth and yielde4
Direction
beneficiale4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–82 · show in text ↑
e4

“The production practices of SRI were found to be beneficial to rice growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–909 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The yield gain under SRI is probably due to better phenotypic expression from its soil-water-crop management practices.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L)Oryza sativae0
Outcome
better yield and productivity resultse7
Qualifier
better phenotypic expressions due to the innovative soil-water-crop management practices of SRIe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improving the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L) in existing irrigated areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“This was probably as a result of better phenotypic expressions due to the innovative soil-water-crop management practices of SRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1615 · show in text ↑
e7

“Overall, SRI production system gave better yield and productivity results than the conventional flooded system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1485 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.