Paper · 2014 · Nanfang nongye xuebao

Effeets of different seedlings raising containers on growth change of Amorpha fruticosa L.

Yang Jing-hu

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】Seedling growth change of Amorpha fruticosa L. was studied by culture in 4 kinds of containers to provide references for container selection for forestry production. 【Method】The plant growth characteristics of Amorpha fruticosa L. were measured by cultivation of general pot, polyporous pot, jardinier, trapezoidal pot in greenhouse and 11growth indexes were synthetically analyzed by membership functions. Effects of different types of containers on the growth of Amorpha fruticosa L. seedlings were evaluated comprehensively. 【Result】The plants in trapezoidal pot had the shortest stem, most leaf number, largest leaf area, the thickest stem, the greatest fresh weight and dry weight of ground and underground parts in plants, the shortest main roots and highest seedling quality index(QI) and its growth grade was AAA. The plants in jardinier had larger leaf area, the highest stem, more or most ground fresh weight and dry weight, and most number of first-grade lateral roots and its growth grade was BBB. The growth grade of porous pots was CCC and ordinary pot was CDB, in which seedling growth was poor, but the seedling quality index(QI) in porous pots was higher.【Conclusion】The trapezoidal pots are optimal for seedling production of forestry. Jardinier also has certain potential in production. The porous pots should be chosen carefully in drought area. The general basin should not be used for raising seedlings of forest tree.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trapezoidal pots produced the shortest stems and main roots.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Treatment
trapezoidal pote0
Outcome
shortest steme0
Direction
shorteste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants in trapezoidal pot had the shortest stem, most leaf number, largest leaf area, the thickest stem, the greatest fresh weight and dry weight of ground and underground parts in plants, the shortest main roots and highest seedling quality index(QI) and its growth grade was AAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trapezoidal pots produced the most leaves and largest leaf area.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Treatment
trapezoidal pote0
Outcome
most leaf number, largest leaf areae0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants in trapezoidal pot had the shortest stem, most leaf number, largest leaf area, the thickest stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trapezoidal pots produced the thickest stems.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Treatment
trapezoidal pote0
Outcome
the thickest steme0
Direction
thickeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants in trapezoidal pot had the shortest stem, most leaf number, largest leaf area, the thickest stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trapezoidal pots gave the greatest aboveground and underground fresh and dry weights.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Outcome
fresh weight and dry weight of ground and underground partse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the greatest fresh weight and dry weight of ground and underground parts in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trapezoidal pots produced the shortest main roots.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Outcome
main rootse0
Direction
shorteste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shortest main roots and highest seedling quality index(QI) and its growth grade was AAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trapezoidal pots gave the highest seedling quality index and growth grade AAA.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Outcome
seedling quality index(QI)e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
AAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest seedling quality index(QI) and its growth grade was AAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jardinier containers produced larger leaves and the tallest stems.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Treatment
jardiniere0
Outcome
larger leaf area, the highest steme0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants in jardinier had larger leaf area, the highest stem, more or most ground fresh weight and dry weight, and most number of first-grade lateral roots and its growth grade was BBB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jardinier containers produced more or the most aboveground fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Treatment
jardiniere0
Outcome
ground fresh weight and dry weighte0
Direction
more or moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants in jardinier had larger leaf area, the highest stem, more or most ground fresh weight and dry weight, and most number of first-grade lateral roots and its growth grade was BBB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jardinier containers produced the most first-grade lateral roots and growth grade BBB.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Outcome
number of first-grade lateral rootse0
Direction
moste0
Qualifier
BBBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most number of first-grade lateral roots and its growth grade was BBB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Porous pots were assigned growth grade CCC and ordinary pots grade CDB, with poor seedling growth.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Outcome
seedling growth was poore0
Qualifier
CCCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth grade of porous pots was CCC and ordinary pot was CDB, in which seedling growth was poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The seedling quality index in porous pots was higher.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Treatment
porous potse0
Outcome
seedling quality index(QI)e0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but the seedling quality index(QI) in porous pots was higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Trapezoidal pots were recommended as optimal for forestry seedling production.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Outcome
trapezoidal pots are optimal for seedling productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trapezoidal pots are optimal for seedling production of forestry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Jardinier containers were judged to have production potential.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Outcome
potential in productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Jardinier also has certain potential in production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Porous pots should be chosen carefully in drought areas.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Outcome
porous pots should be chosen carefully in drought areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The porous pots should be chosen carefully in drought area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

General pots should not be used for raising forest tree seedlings.

Taxon
Amorpha fruticosa L.Amorpha fruticosat0
Outcome
general basin should not be used for raising seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amorpha fruticosa
Amorpha fruticosa · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The general basin should not be used for raising seedlings of forest tree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amorpha fruticosa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–90 · show in text ↑