Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Production

PERFORMANCE OF SOME FABA BEAN ( Vicia faba, L. ) CULTIVARS UNDER NUMEROUS BROOMRAPE ( Orobanche crenata, Forsk. ) CONTROL TREATMENTS.

A. Ghalwash; I. Soliman; Azza Khaffagy

18
claims
49
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during 2005/06 and 2006/07 winter seasons at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Egypt to investigate the performance of three cultivars of faba bean (Misr 1, Giza 843, and Sakha 2) under some broomrape control treatments and their effects on yield and its components of faba bean. Orbanche control treatments were: glyphosate 36 g a.i. applied once or twice; imazapic 20 g a.i. applied once or twice; in addition to hand pulling and weedy check. Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %, respectively during 2005/06 and 2006/07 seasons. Faba bean variety Misr 1 recorded the highest values of yield and its component characters, followed by faba bean Giza 843 variety as compared to faba bean Sakha 2 variety during both seasons. Also, data revealed that all weed control treatment significantly decreased broomrape infestation parameters and increased crop yield and its components, significantly in both seasons. Ressults revealed that all broomrape control treatments gave highly significant increase in seed yield ( ardab/ fed ), the highest values was obtained from imazapic (twice) and hand pulling (twice), followed by imazapic (once), glyphosate (twice) and glyphosate (once) by 106.93, 99.01, 82.83, 70.96 and 41.58% in the first season, and by 101.27, 94.62. 91.77, 63.29 and 37.03% in second season, respectively. The interaction between varieties and weed control treatments exerted a significant impact on broomrape infestation characters in both seasons, and this reflected on faba bean yield and its components. These results indicate that under heavy invested soil with broomrape, it is possible to grow tolerant cultivars (Misr 1 and Giza 843) with the application of herbicides i.e imazapic or glyphosate (twice). These practices gave the highest reduction in broomrape injury and increased faba bean yield and its components.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 reduced broomrape spike number in 2005/06 by 42.89%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Material
Misr 1e0
Treatment
Misr 1 varietye0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
number of broomrape spikes/m²e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
42.89e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 reduced broomrape spike number in 2006/07 by 27.38%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Material
Misr 1e0
Treatment
Misr 1 varietye0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
number of broomrape spikes/m²e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
27.38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 reduced broomrape spike weight by 20.43% in the first season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Misr 1e1
Treatment
Misr 1 varietye1
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
weight of broomrape spikes/m²e0
Direction
decreasede1
Value
20.43e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 reduced broomrape spike weight by 20.17% in the second season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Misr 1e1
Treatment
Misr 1 varietye1
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
weight of broomrape spikes/m²e0
Direction
decreasede1
Value
20.17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 reduced broomrape spike length by 19.94% in the first season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Misr 1e1
Treatment
Misr 1 varietye1
Interactor
broomrapee1parasite
Outcome
spikes lengthe0
Direction
decreasede1
Value
19.94e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 reduced broomrape spike length by 19.68% in the second season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Misr 1e1
Treatment
Misr 1 varietye1
Interactor
broomrapee1parasite
Outcome
spikes lengthe0
Direction
decreasede1
Value
19.68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 reduced broomrape capsules per spike by 28.5% in the first season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Misr 1e1
Treatment
Misr 1 varietye1
Interactor
broomrapee1parasite
Outcome
number of capsules/spikese0
Direction
decreasede1
Value
28.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 reduced broomrape capsules per spike by 42.65% in the second season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Misr 1e1
Treatment
Misr 1 varietye1
Interactor
broomrapee1parasite
Outcome
number of capsules/spikese0
Direction
decreasede1
Value
42.65 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 had the highest yield and yield components, followed by Giza 843, relative to Sakha 2.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabae0
Material
Misr 1e0
Treatment
Misr 1e0
Outcome
yield and its component characterse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
Giza 843e0
Comparator
Sakha 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Faba bean variety Misr 1 recorded the highest values of yield and its component characters, followed by faba bean Giza 843 variety as compared to faba bean Sakha 2 variety during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control treatments significantly lowered broomrape infestation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
weed control treatmente0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape infestation parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all weed control treatment significantly decreased broomrape infestation parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control treatments significantly raised crop yield and components.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
weed control treatmente0
Outcome
crop yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all weed control treatment significantly decreased broomrape infestation parameters and increased crop yield and its components, significantly in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-applied imazapic increased seed yield by 106.93% in the first season and 101.27% in the second.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
imazapic (twice)e0
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
106.93e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values was obtained from imazapic (twice) and hand pulling (twice), followed by imazapic (once), glyphosate (twice) and glyphosate (once) by 106.93, 99.01, 82.83, 70.96 and 41.58% in the first season, and by 101.27, 94.62. 91.77, 63.29 and 37.03% in second season, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1565 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
e2

“highly significant increase in seed yield ( ardab/ fed )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand pulling increased seed yield by 99.01% in the first season and 94.62% in the second.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
hand pulling (twice)e0
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
99.01e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand pulling (twice), followed by imazapic (once), glyphosate (twice) and glyphosate (once) by 106.93, 99.01, 82.83, 70.96 and 41.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
e2

“highly significant increase in seed yield ( ardab/ fed )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Once-applied imazapic increased seed yield by 82.83% in the first season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
imazapic (once)e0
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
82.83e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imazapic (once), glyphosate (twice) and glyphosate (once) by 106.93, 99.01, 82.83, 70.96 and 41.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
e2

“highly significant increase in seed yield ( ardab/ fed )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-applied glyphosate increased seed yield by 70.96% in the first season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
glyphosate (twice)e0
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
70.96e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate (twice) and glyphosate (once) by 106.93, 99.01, 82.83, 70.96 and 41.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
e2

“highly significant increase in seed yield ( ardab/ fed )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Once-applied glyphosate increased seed yield by 41.58% in the first season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
glyphosate (once)e0
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
41.58e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate (once) by 106.93, 99.01, 82.83, 70.96 and 41.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that faba bean Misr 1 variety decreased number of broomrape spikes/m² by 42.89 and 27.38%; weight of broomrape spikes/m² by 20.43 and 20.17%; spikes length by 19.94 and 19.68% and number of capsules/spikes by 28.5 and 42.65 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–728 · show in text ↑
e2

“highly significant increase in seed yield ( ardab/ fed )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1274 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and control treatment interaction significantly affected broomrape infestation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape infestation characterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between varieties and weed control treatments exerted a significant impact on broomrape infestation characters in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Misr 1 or Giza 843 with twice-applied imazapic or glyphosate on heavily infested soil.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Misr 1 and Giza 843e0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
grow tolerant cultivars (Misr 1 and Giza 843) with the application of herbicides i.e imazapic or glyphosate (twice)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under heavy invested soil with broomrape, it is possible to grow tolerant cultivars (Misr 1 and Giza 843) with the application of herbicides i.e imazapic or glyphosate (twice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1972 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

imazapic · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.