Paper · 2021 · Forest Pathology

Susceptibility of sugar pine, Shasta red fir and Sierra lodgepole pine to mountain hemlock dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobiumtsugensesubsp.mertensianae, Viscaceae) in south central Oregon

Brent W. Oblinger

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In southern Oregon and northern California, mountain hemlock dwarf mistletoe (MHDM; Arceuthobium tsugense subsp. mertensianae ) commonly parasitizes mountain hemlock ( Tsuga mertensiana ) in multiple mountain ranges such as the Cascades, Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains. However, limited information is available on the susceptibility of sugar pine ( Pinus lambertiana ), Shasta red fir ( Abies magnifica var. shastensis ) and lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta ) to MHDM. From 2015–2019, I found MHDM on sugar pine at multiple sites in northwestern Klamath County, Oregon. To evaluate the susceptibilities of sugar pine, Shasta red fir and Sierra lodgepole pine to MHDM infection, 41 temporary, fixed‐radius plots (area 182.4 m 2 ) were established at five sites in 2018 and 2019 around an overstory tree (western white, sugar and whitebark pines along with one mountain hemlock) severely infected with MHDM in each plot centre. Live trees ≥2.6 cm in diameter at breast height (1.37 m; dbh) were assigned a dwarf mistletoe severity rating (6‐class system) and incidence (% infection) of MHDM on live trees at the tree level were used to estimate host susceptibilities. To confirm the identity of the dwarf mistletoe infecting live trees in each plot, dwarf mistletoe specimens were collected from the severely infected tree at the centre of each plot and from all tree species bearing dwarf mistletoe in each plot. Morphological characters were used to identify the dwarf mistletoe plants on each tree species and included plant heights, length of the third internode and plant colour. Dwarf mistletoe plants were collected from each affected tree species, and morphological characteristics of aerial shoots of dwarf mistletoes were examined in the laboratory. Morphological measurements confirmed the dwarf mistletoe infesting each plot was MHDM. Mountain hemlock dwarf mistletoe was found on sugar pine in all 41 plots. At the tree level after pooling larger sugar pine trees from all plots (total of 164 live trees ≥2.6 cm dbh), incidence was 76%. Morphological characteristics of MHDM aerial shoots, such as colour, shoot height and third internode length, were consistent with previous descriptions of MHDM plants. These data indicate that sugar pine should be classified as a secondary host of MHDM in the Oregon East Cascades, and not as a rare host as previously reported. No dwarf mistletoe plants were found on 98 living Shasta red fir trees ≥2.6 cm dbh in 26 plots. Shasta red fir should be classified as immune to MHDM. No MHDM was found on 573 living lodgepole pines of this size in 41 plots, and the tree species should be classified as immune to MHDM. Western white ( Pinus monticola ) and whitebark ( Pinus albicaulis ) pines were severely parasitized by MHDM with 92% and 100% incidence, respectively. However, because the sample sizes for these white pines were relatively small, additional work is needed to evaluate the susceptibility of these pines to MHDM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mountain hemlock dwarf mistletoe occurred on sugar pine in all 41 plots.

Taxon
sugar pinePinus lambertianae0
Interactor
Mountain hemlock dwarf mistletoee0parasite
Outcome
found on sugar pinee0
Value
41 plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus lambertiana
Pinus lambertiana · TaxonMitch from Costa Mesa, CA, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mountain hemlock dwarf mistletoe was found on sugar pine in all 41 plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1931 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar pine infection incidence was 76%.

Taxon
sugar pinePinus lambertianat0
Interactor
mountain hemlock dwarf mistletoet0parasite
Outcome
incidencee0
Value
76%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus lambertiana
Pinus lambertiana · TaxonMitch from Costa Mesa, CA, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incidence was 76%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2043–2060 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar pine, Shasta red fir and Sierra lodgepole pine to mountain hemlock dwarf mistletoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No dwarf mistletoe was found on 98 Shasta red fir trees.

Interactor
dwarf mistletoee0parasite
Outcome
No dwarf mistletoe plants were founde0
Value
98 living Shasta red fir treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abies magnifica var. shastensis
Abies magnifica var. shastensis · TaxonDavid Prasad from Welches, OR., United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No dwarf mistletoe plants were found on 98 living Shasta red fir trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2392–2462 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No mistletoe was found on 573 lodgepole pines.

Taxon
lodgepole pinesPinus contortae0
Interactor
MHDMe0parasite
Outcome
No MHDM was founde0
Value
573 living lodgepole pinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No MHDM was found on 573 living lodgepole pines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2543–2590 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Western white pine incidence was 92%.

Taxon
Western whitePontia occidentalise0
Interactor
MHDMe0parasite
Outcome
incidencee0
Value
92%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pontia occidentalis
Pontia occidentalis · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Western white ( Pinus monticola ) and whitebark ( Pinus albicaulis ) pines were severely parasitized by MHDM with 92% and 100% incidence, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2678–2828 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitebark pine incidence was 100%.

Taxon
whitebarke0
Interactor
MHDMe0parasite
Outcome
incidencee0
Value
100%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Western white ( Pinus monticola ) and whitebark ( Pinus albicaulis ) pines were severely parasitized by MHDM with 92% and 100% incidence, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2678–2828 · show in text ↑