Paper · 2021 · Plants

Application of Ascophyllum nodosum-Based Soluble Extract on Micropropagation and Regeneration of Nicotiana benthamiana and Prunus domestica

Mohamed Faize; Lydia Faize; Lorenzo Burgos; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the present study, the effect of a commercial extract of the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum on in vitro micropropagation, shoot regeneration, and rhizoghenesis were studied in Nicotiana benthamiana and Prunus domestica. Results showed that the MS medium supplemented with various concentrations of the Ascophyllum extract (5, 10, 50, and 100 mg L−1) significantly enhanced the number of regenerated buds from N. benthamiana leaf discs to the conventional MS regenerating medium. Increases ranged from 3.5 to 6.5 times higher than the control. The effect of the Ascophyllum extract on N. benthamiana micropropagation was assessed through the measurement of some plant growth parameters. Results showed that the extract alone could not replace the micropropagation medium since shoot length, shoot diameter, root length, and leaf area were significantly reduced. However, its combination with a half-strength MS medium enhanced these parameters. Its effect was also evaluated on regeneration from plum hypocotyl slices. When added to the shoot regeneration medium without any plant growth regulators, the Ascophyllum extract alone could induce shoot regeneration. However, the percentage of bud regeneration and number of regenerated buds were lower than with the conventional shoot regeneration medium containing complete growth regulators. In contrast, the Ascophyllum extract drastically promoted rhizogenesis from plum hypocotyl slices. These results pave the way for the possible use of A. nodosum extracts in in vitro mass propagation of higher plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascophyllum extract increased regenerated buds from tobacco leaf discs by 3.5 to 6.5 times.

Taxon
N. benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Organ / stage
leaf discse0
Treatment
Ascophyllum extract (5, 10, 50, and 100 mg L−1)e0
Outcome
number of regenerated budse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
3.5 to 6.5 timese0
Comparator
conventional MS regenerating mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MS medium supplemented with various concentrations of the Ascophyllum extract (5, 10, 50, and 100 mg L−1) significantly enhanced the number of regenerated buds from N. benthamiana leaf discs to the conventional MS regenerating medium. Increases ranged from 3.5 to 6.5 times higher than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract alone reduced tobacco shoot and root lengths, shoot diameter and leaf area versus micropropagation medium.

Taxon
N. benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae1
Treatment
extract alonee0
Outcome
shoot length, shoot diameter, root length, and leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
micropropagation mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extract alone could not replace the micropropagation medium since shoot length, shoot diameter, root length, and leaf area were significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nicotiana benthamiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. benthamiana leaf discs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract with half-strength MS medium enhanced those tobacco growth parameters.

Taxon
Nicotiana benthamianaNicotiana benthamianat0
Treatment
combination with a half-strength MS mediume0
Outcome
shoot length, shoot diameter, root length, and leaf areae1
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its combination with a half-strength MS medium enhanced these parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nicotiana benthamiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“shoot length, shoot diameter, root length, and leaf area were significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascophyllum extract alone induced shoot regeneration in plum hypocotyl slices without growth regulators.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticat0
Organ / stage
hypocotyl slicese1
Treatment
Ascophyllum extract alonee0
Outcome
shoot regeneratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When added to the shoot regeneration medium without any plant growth regulators, the Ascophyllum extract alone could induce shoot regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus domestica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“regeneration from plum hypocotyl slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plum bud regeneration percentage and bud number were lower with extract alone than conventional medium.

Taxon
Prunus domesticaPrunus domesticat0
Treatment
Ascophyllum extracte1
Outcome
percentage of bud regeneration and number of regenerated budse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
conventional shoot regeneration medium containing complete growth regulatorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of bud regeneration and number of regenerated buds were lower than with the conventional shoot regeneration medium containing complete growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ascophyllum nodosum-Based Soluble Extract on Micropropagation and Regeneration of Nicotiana benthamiana and Prunus domestica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Ascophyllum extract alone could induce shoot regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascophyllum extract promoted rhizogenesis from plum hypocotyl slices.

Organ / stage
hypocotyl slicese0
Treatment
Ascophyllum extracte0
Outcome
rhizogenesise0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Ascophyllum extract drastically promoted rhizogenesis from plum hypocotyl slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1437 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.