Paper · 2021 · Plants

ISSR-Based Genetic Diversity Assessment of Genus Jasminum L. (Oleaceae) from Pakistan

Naeem Akhtar; Ishfaq Ahmad Hafiz; Muhammad Qasim Hayat; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The genus Jasminum L., of the family Oleaceae, includes many species occurring in the wild, or cultivated worldwide. A preliminary investigation based on inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR) was performed to assess the genetic diversity among 28 accessions, representing nine species of Jasminum from various regions, representing a range of altitudes in Pakistan. A total of 21 ISSR primers were used, which produced 570 amplified bands of different sizes, with a mean polymorphic band percentage of 98.26%. The maximum resolving power, polymorphism information content, and index values of the ISSR markers recorded for primers 6, 16, and 19 were 0.40, 12.32, and 24.21, respectively. Based on the data of the ISSR markers, the resulting UPGMA dendrogram with the Jaccard coefficient divided the 28 accessions into two main clades. At the species level, the highest values for Shannon’s information index, polymorphism percentage, effective allele number, Nei’s genetic variations, and genetic unbiased diversity were found in Jasminum sambac L. and J. humile L., while the lowest were observed in J. mesnyi Hance and J. nitidum Skan. Based on Nei’s unbiased genetic identity pairwise population matrix, the maximum identity (0.804) was observed between J. elongatum Willd and J. multiflorum (Burm. f.) Andrews, and the lowest (0.566) between J. nitidum Skan. and J. azoricum L. Molecular variance analysis displayed a genetic variation of 79% among the nine populations. The study was aimed to established genetic diversity in Jasminum species using ISSR markers. With the help of this technique, we were able to establish immense intra- and interspecific diversity across the Jasminum species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR primers yielded 570 bands with 98.26% mean polymorphism.

Taxon
JasminumJasminumt0
Outcome
amplified bandse0
Value
570 amplified bandse0
Qualifier
98.26%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jasminum
Jasminum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Didier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 21 ISSR primers were used, which produced 570 amplified bands of different sizes, with a mean polymorphic band percentage of 98.26%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jasminum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR marker maxima were reported for primers 6, 16 and 19.

Taxon
JasminumJasminumt0
Material
primers 6e0
Outcome
resolving powere0
Value
0.40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jasminum
Jasminum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Didier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum resolving power, polymorphism information content, and index values of the ISSR markers recorded for primers 6, 16, and 19 were 0.40, 12.32, and 24.21, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jasminum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum polymorphism information content was 12.32 for primer 16.

Taxon
JasminumJasminumt0
Outcome
polymorphism information contente0
Value
12.32e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jasminum
Jasminum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Didier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polymorphism information content, and index values of the ISSR markers recorded for primers 6, 16, and 19 were 0.40, 12.32, and 24.21, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jasminum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum ISSR index was 24.21 for primer 19.

Taxon
JasminumJasminumt0
Outcome
index valuese0
Value
24.21e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jasminum
Jasminum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Didier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“index values of the ISSR markers recorded for primers 6, 16, and 19 were 0.40, 12.32, and 24.21, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jasminum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The UPGMA dendrogram divided 28 accessions into two main clades.

Taxon
JasminumJasminumt0
Outcome
two main cladese0
Value
two main cladese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jasminum
Jasminum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Didier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the resulting UPGMA dendrogram with the Jaccard coefficient divided the 28 accessions into two main clades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jasminum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jasminum sambac and J. humile had the highest species-level diversity indices.

Taxon
Jasminum sambac L. and J. humile L.Chrysojasminum humileJasminum sambace0
Outcome
Shannon’s information index, polymorphism percentage, effective allele number, Nei’s genetic variations, and genetic unbiased diversitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysojasminum humile
Chrysojasminum humile · TaxonShu Suehiro · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Jasminum sambac
Jasminum sambac · TaxonHabib M'henni · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values for Shannon’s information index, polymorphism percentage, effective allele number, Nei’s genetic variations, and genetic unbiased diversity were found in Jasminum sambac L. and J. humile L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J. mesnyi and J. nitidum had the lowest species-level diversity indices.

Taxon
J. mesnyi Hance and J. nitidum SkanJasminum mesnyiJasminum laurifolium f. nitidume0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jasminum mesnyi
Jasminum mesnyi · TaxonWouter Hagens · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Jasminum laurifolium f. nitidum
Jasminum laurifolium f. nitidum · Taxon · picture of the speciesOriginal uploader was Monocromatico at pt.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest were observed in J. mesnyi Hance and J. nitidum Skan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum genetic identity was 0.804 between J. elongatum and J. multiflorum.

Taxon
J. elongatum Willd and J. multiflorum (Burm. f.) AndrewsJasminum multiflorumJasminum elongatume0
Outcome
identitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.804e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jasminum multiflorum
Jasminum multiflorum · TaxonAtamari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Jasminum elongatum
Jasminum elongatum · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum identity (0.804) was observed between J. elongatum Willd and J. multiflorum (Burm. f.) Andrews”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1312 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum genetic identity was 0.566 between J. nitidum and J. azoricum.

Taxon
J. nitidum Skan. and J. azoricum L.Jasminum laurifolium f. nitidumJasminum azoricume0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.566e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jasminum laurifolium f. nitidum
Jasminum laurifolium f. nitidum · Taxon · picture of the speciesOriginal uploader was Monocromatico at pt.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Jasminum azoricum
Jasminum azoricum · TaxonDaniel Feliciano · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest (0.566) between J. nitidum Skan. and J. azoricum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic variation among the nine populations was 79%.

Taxon
JasminumJasminumt0
Outcome
genetic variatione0
Value
79%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jasminum
Jasminum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Didier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Molecular variance analysis displayed a genetic variation of 79% among the nine populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jasminum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑