Paper · 2021 · Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal

Influence of Bio-Fertilizers and Addition Methods on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Pepper Under Green House

Samer Mohammed Ahmed; Ali jabar Abdulsada; Naeem Saeed Deiab; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of some biofertilizers and addition methods on growth, yield, and quality of sweet pepper were studied under greenhouse conditions. This research was conducted at ALLatifia Research Station(Located 35 km south of Baghdad), Agricultural Research Directorate, Baghdad- Iraq, during season 2016. The factors were methods of adding biofertilizers (A) included added to seeds (A1) and added to transplants (A2) and bio-fertilizers (T) included without adding any biofertilizers as control(T0), Pseudomonas fluorescence (T1), Azospirillim brasilense (T2), Bacillus subtillus (T3) and Azotobactor chroococcum (T4). Results showed a significant increase in plant height for treatment of Azotobacter chroococcum which recorded (79.00 cm) compared with (65.00 cm) in the control treatment. There is no significant influence of biofertilizers treatments in leaf area dcm2. Moreover, the treatment of Azotobacter chroococcum showed a significant increase for plant yield and total yield which recorded (1344.00 gm plant-1 and 1512.00 kg green house-1) respectively in comparison with the control treatment which recorded( 880.00 gm plant-1 and 989.00 kg green house-1) respectively

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter chroococcum increased sweet pepper plant height significantly relative to the control treatment.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume1
Treatment
Azotobacter chroococcume2
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume2symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
increasee2
Value
79.00 cme2
Qualifier
65.00 cme2
Comparator
control treatmente2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of some biofertilizers and addition methods on growth, yield, and quality of sweet pepper were studied under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed a significant increase in plant height for treatment of Azotobacter chroococcum which recorded (79.00 cm) compared with (65.00 cm) in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter chroococcum significantly increased sweet pepper plant yield relative to the control treatment.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume1
Treatment
Azotobacter chroococcume2
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume2symbiont
Outcome
plant yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
1344.00 gm plant-1e3
Qualifier
880.00 gm plant-1e3
Comparator
control treatmente3
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of some biofertilizers and addition methods on growth, yield, and quality of sweet pepper were studied under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed a significant increase in plant height for treatment of Azotobacter chroococcum which recorded (79.00 cm) compared with (65.00 cm) in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–789 · show in text ↑
e3

“showed a significant increase for plant yield and total yield which recorded (1344.00 gm plant-1 and 1512.00 kg green house-1) respectively in comparison with the control treatment which recorded( 880.00 gm plant-1 and 989.00 kg green house-1) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter chroococcum significantly increased sweet pepper total yield relative to the control treatment.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume1
Treatment
Azotobacter chroococcume2
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume2symbiont
Outcome
total yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
1512.00 kg green house-1e3
Qualifier
989.00 kg green house-1e3
Comparator
control treatmente3
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of some biofertilizers and addition methods on growth, yield, and quality of sweet pepper were studied under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed a significant increase in plant height for treatment of Azotobacter chroococcum which recorded (79.00 cm) compared with (65.00 cm) in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–789 · show in text ↑
e3

“showed a significant increase for plant yield and total yield which recorded (1344.00 gm plant-1 and 1512.00 kg green house-1) respectively in comparison with the control treatment which recorded( 880.00 gm plant-1 and 989.00 kg green house-1) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer treatments did not significantly influence sweet pepper leaf area.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume1
Treatment
biofertilizers treatmentse4
Outcome
leaf areae4
Direction
no significant influencee4
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of some biofertilizers and addition methods on growth, yield, and quality of sweet pepper were studied under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e4

“There is no significant influence of biofertilizers treatments in leaf area dcm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–871 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 48 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.