Abstract
The present research work entitled ‘Year around flowering strategy for Jasminum sambac L’ was carried out at Floriculture Research Farm, ASPEE College of Horticulture and Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari during 2017-18. It was conducted using various treatments including foliar application of stimulants like FeSO4 (0.5 %), ZnSO4 (0.5 %) and Panchgavya (1%) along with the tip pruning in the month of June. Among the vegetative parameters (viz., plant height and leaf area) there was no significant difference was observed among various treatments. Whereas, in case of the flower quality (viz., flower bud diameter, flower size fully open, flower bud size and weight of 100 flower buds) and yield parameters were significantly influenced by treatment T7 – FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after pruning + tip pruning in June + FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after tip pruning.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar stimulants and tip pruning did not significantly change plant height or leaf area among treatments.
- Taxon
- Jasminum sambac
Jasminum sambact0 - Treatment
- foliar application of stimulants like FeSO4 (0.5 %), ZnSO4 (0.5 %) and Panchgavya (1%)e0
- Outcome
- plant height and leaf areae1
- Direction
- no significant differencee1
- Comparator
- various treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Jasminum sambac L”
e0“foliar application of stimulants like FeSO4 (0.5 %), ZnSO4 (0.5 %) and Panchgavya (1%) along with the tip pruning in the month of June”
e1“Among the vegetative parameters (viz., plant height and leaf area) there was no significant difference was observed among various treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 significantly influenced flower quality in Jasminum sambac.
- Taxon
- Jasminum sambacJasminum sambact0
- Treatment
- FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after pruning + tip pruning in June + FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after tip pruninge2
- Outcome
- flower qualitye2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Jasminum sambac L”
e2“in case of the flower quality (viz., flower bud diameter, flower size fully open, flower bud size and weight of 100 flower buds) and yield parameters were significantly influenced by treatment T7 – FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after pruning + tip pruning in June + FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after tip pruning”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 significantly influenced yield parameters in Jasminum sambac.
- Taxon
- Jasminum sambacJasminum sambact0
- Treatment
- FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after pruning + tip pruning in June + FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after tip pruninge2
- Outcome
- yield parameterse2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Jasminum sambac L”
e2“in case of the flower quality (viz., flower bud diameter, flower size fully open, flower bud size and weight of 100 flower buds) and yield parameters were significantly influenced by treatment T7 – FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after pruning + tip pruning in June + FeSO4 (0.5%) + ZnSO4 (0.5%) twice after tip pruning”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Jasminum sambac (Arabian jasmine)Positive and negative results
7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.