Abstract
The experiment was carried out to evaluation of technological gap and performance of integrated pest management (IPM) come upto as a resistant variety, tap crop as marigold line, bio pesticides as Ha NPV, chemical spray as sucking pest Dimethoate at before flowering time and borer managemant as Acephate fruiting time of tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera pest under field condition. This experiment was conducted on farmer trials (OFT) at different villages likewise Hemawas, Sandeyo Ki Dhani and Baldo Ki Dhani in Pali district (Rajasthan) during period of three year (2015 to 2017). During this experiment pest infestation of fruit borer was observed to be lowest (Pest infestation 12.0%) when, resistant variety Heemsohna, tap crop use African marigold, tomato line ratio 2:14, Ha NPV 250 LE @ 0.4 ml/lit of water at 30 DAP and 45 DAP Dimethoate 0.5 ml/ lit at before flowering time and Acephate 0.5 g/lit at 45 fruiting time. Maximum infestation pest damage (44.00%) was observed when traditional farmers practice (FP). The adoption of recommended improved tomato production technology and plant protection measures was poor. The main objective of the OFT was to conduct extent of technological gap between recommended and actually adopted tomato technologies by the tomato growers from Pali district. It is suggest organising result OFT and field visits for minimizing technological gap by agriculture department. The OFT was effective in changing attitude, skill and knowledge of IPM approach and tomato fruit yield increased upto 57.52 per cent more over the traditional FP. Results indicates that IPM approach increased net income by Rs. 1,74,781/-ha over FP.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM package yielded 12.0% fruit borer infestation, the lowest observed.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Treatment
- resistant variety Heemsohna, tap crop use African marigold, tomato line ratio 2:14, Ha NPV 250 LE @ 0.4 ml/lit of water at 30 DAP and 45 DAP Dimethoate 0.5 ml/ lit at before flowering time and Acephate 0.5 g/lit at 45 fruiting timee0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae1pest - Outcome
- pest infestation of fruit borere0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 12.0%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“pest infestation of fruit borer was observed to be lowest (Pest infestation 12.0%) when, resistant variety Heemsohna, tap crop use African marigold, tomato line ratio 2:14, Ha NPV 250 LE @ 0.4 ml/lit of water at 30 DAP and 45 DAP Dimethoate 0.5 ml/ lit at before flowering time and Acephate 0.5 g/lit at 45 fruiting time”
e1“tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera pest under field condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Traditional farmer practice had 44.00% pest damage, the maximum observed.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- traditional farmers practice (FP)e0
- Outcome
- infestation pest damagee0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 44.00%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum infestation pest damage (44.00%) was observed when traditional farmers practice (FP)”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Adoption of recommended tomato production and protection measures was poor.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- adoption of recommended improved tomato production technology and plant protection measurese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The adoption of recommended improved tomato production technology and plant protection measures was poor”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM trial increased tomato fruit yield by up to 57.52% over farmer practice.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- tomato fruit yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 57.52 per cente0
- Comparator
- traditional FPe0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tomato fruit yield increased upto 57.52 per cent more over the traditional FP”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM increased net income by Rs. 1,74,781/-ha over farmer practice.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- IPM approache0
- Outcome
- net incomee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- Rs. 1,74,781/-hae0
- Comparator
- FPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“IPM approach increased net income by Rs. 1,74,781/-ha over FP”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest on-farm trials and visits to reduce the technology gap.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Outcome
- organising result OFT and field visits for minimizing technological gape0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It is suggest organising result OFT and field visits for minimizing technological gap by agriculture department”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
dimethoate · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
acephate · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
ipm · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.