Paper · 2021 · Vestnik of Kazan state agrarin university

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BIOLOGICAL FUNGICIDES AGAINST THE SPARE PARTS OF THE LEAVES OF WINTER WHEAT IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE CENTRAL ZONE OF THE KRASNODAR TERRITORY

Mariya Gvozdeva; Galina Volkova

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The biologization of plant growing in modern conditions is becoming an urgent trend in agriculture, which helps to reduce the pesticide load. An important aspect of the transition to organic farming is the use of fungicides based on living microorganisms and their metabolic products to curb the development of diseases. Studies were carried out to assess the effectiveness of modern biofungicides against leaf septoria (Septoria tritici) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) of winter wheat - Vitaplan, SP, Gamair, SP, Pseudobacterin-2, Zh, Rizoplan, Zh, Trichocin, SP, Fitosporin -M, SP. Fungicide Amistar Extra, SK was used as a chemical standard. The work was carried out in the conditions of the central zone of the Krasnodar Territory in 2019–2020 on the variety Grom, susceptible to leaf spots. The meteorological conditions of the first year of research were favorable for the development of pathogens of leaf spots. In the second year, conditions were extreme, both for the growth of wheat plants and for the development of phytopathogens. For two years of research, the most effective biofungicides against leaf septoria were Fitosporin-M, SP, Pseudobacterin-2, Zh and Vitaplan, SP, the biological effectiveness was 50.0%, 50.0% and 47.1%, respectively; against yellow spot - Vitaplan, SP and Trichocin, SP, biological efficiency was 48.4% and 45.9%. The use of biological fungicides made it possible to save from 2.5% (Gamair, SP) to 12.6% (Trichocin, SP) of the winter wheat grain yield in comparison with the control (without treatment). The high economic efficiency of the use of biofungicides was established, the maximum net profit was noted in the variant treated with Fitosporin - M, SP (9540 rubles / ha)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fitosporin-M, SP was among the most effective biofungicides against leaf septoria, with 50.0% biological effectiveness.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Grome3
Treatment
Fitosporin-M, SPe1
Interactor
Septoria triticiZymoseptoria triticie2pathogen
Outcome
biological effectivenesse1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
50.0%e1
Setting
central zone of the Krasnodar Territorye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For two years of research, the most effective biofungicides against leaf septoria were Fitosporin-M, SP, Pseudobacterin-2, Zh and Vitaplan, SP, the biological effectiveness was 50.0%, 50.0% and 47.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1272 · show in text ↑
e2

“Studies were carried out to assess the effectiveness of modern biofungicides against leaf septoria (Septoria tritici) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–501 · show in text ↑
e3

“The work was carried out in the conditions of the central zone of the Krasnodar Territory in 2019–2020 on the variety Grom, susceptible to leaf spots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudobacterin-2, Zh was among the most effective biofungicides against leaf septoria, with 50.0% biological effectiveness.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Grome3
Treatment
Pseudobacterin-2, Zhe1
Interactor
Septoria triticiZymoseptoria triticie2pathogen
Outcome
biological effectivenesse1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
50.0%e1
Setting
central zone of the Krasnodar Territorye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For two years of research, the most effective biofungicides against leaf septoria were Fitosporin-M, SP, Pseudobacterin-2, Zh and Vitaplan, SP, the biological effectiveness was 50.0%, 50.0% and 47.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1272 · show in text ↑
e2

“Studies were carried out to assess the effectiveness of modern biofungicides against leaf septoria (Septoria tritici) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–501 · show in text ↑
e3

“The work was carried out in the conditions of the central zone of the Krasnodar Territory in 2019–2020 on the variety Grom, susceptible to leaf spots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitaplan, SP was among the most effective biofungicides against leaf septoria, with 47.1% biological effectiveness.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Grome3
Treatment
Vitaplan, SPe1
Interactor
Septoria triticiZymoseptoria triticie2pathogen
Outcome
biological effectivenesse1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
47.1%e1
Setting
central zone of the Krasnodar Territorye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“For two years of research, the most effective biofungicides against leaf septoria were Fitosporin-M, SP, Pseudobacterin-2, Zh and Vitaplan, SP, the biological effectiveness was 50.0%, 50.0% and 47.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1272 · show in text ↑
e2

“Studies were carried out to assess the effectiveness of modern biofungicides against leaf septoria (Septoria tritici) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–501 · show in text ↑
e3

“The work was carried out in the conditions of the central zone of the Krasnodar Territory in 2019–2020 on the variety Grom, susceptible to leaf spots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitaplan, SP reached 48.4% biological efficiency against yellow spot.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Vitaplan, SPe4
Interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise2pathogen
Outcome
biological efficiencye4
Value
48.4%e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Studies were carried out to assess the effectiveness of modern biofungicides against leaf septoria (Septoria tritici) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–501 · show in text ↑
e4

“against yellow spot - Vitaplan, SP and Trichocin, SP, biological efficiency was 48.4% and 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichocin, SP reached 45.9% biological efficiency against yellow spot.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Trichocin, SPe4
Interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise2pathogen
Outcome
biological efficiencye4
Value
45.9%e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Studies were carried out to assess the effectiveness of modern biofungicides against leaf septoria (Septoria tritici) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–501 · show in text ↑
e4

“against yellow spot - Vitaplan, SP and Trichocin, SP, biological efficiency was 48.4% and 45.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fungicides saved 2.5% to 12.6% of winter wheat grain yield relative to untreated control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume5
Treatment
use of biological fungicidese5
Outcome
winter wheat grain yielde5
Direction
savee5
Value
2.5% (Gamair, SP) to 12.6% (Trichocin, SP)e5
Comparator
control (without treatment)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The use of biological fungicides made it possible to save from 2.5% (Gamair, SP) to 12.6% (Trichocin, SP) of the winter wheat grain yield in comparison with the control (without treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fitosporin - M, SP gave the maximum net profit, 9540 rubles per hectare.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Fitosporin - M, SPe6
Outcome
net profite6
Direction
maximume6
Value
9540 rubles / hae6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Studies were carried out to assess the effectiveness of modern biofungicides against leaf septoria (Septoria tritici) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–501 · show in text ↑
e6

“The high economic efficiency of the use of biofungicides was established, the maximum net profit was noted in the variant treated with Fitosporin - M, SP (9540 rubles / ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1733 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The use of biofungicides was established to have high economic efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Outcome
high economic efficiency of the use of biofungicidese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Studies were carried out to assess the effectiveness of modern biofungicides against leaf septoria (Septoria tritici) and yellow spot (Pyrenophora tritici-repentis) of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–501 · show in text ↑
e6

“The high economic efficiency of the use of biofungicides was established, the maximum net profit was noted in the variant treated with Fitosporin - M, SP (9540 rubles / ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1733 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.