Paper · 2021 · Plant Health Progress

Geographic Distribution of Ophiosphaerella Species in the Mid-Atlantic United States

Wendell J. Hutchens; Caleb A. Henderson; Elizabeth A. Bush; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Spring dead spot (SDS) of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) is primarily caused by Ophiosphaerella herpotricha and Ophiosphaerella korrae in North America. These two species respond differently to numerous management practices, grow optimally at different soil pH ranges, and differ in aggressiveness. Understanding the Ophiosphaerella species distribution in regions where SDS occurs will allow turfgrass managers to tailor their management practices toward the predominant species present. A survey was conducted in the Mid-Atlantic United States in which 1 to 14 samples of bermudagrass expressing SDS symptoms were taken from 51 athletic fields, golf courses, or sod farms across Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia. DNA was isolated from necrotic root and stolon tissue, amplified using species-specific primers, and detected in a real-time PCR assay. At least one isolate of O. herpotricha was recovered from 76% of the locations, and O. korrae was recovered from 73% of the locations. O. herpotricha was amplified from 55% of the samples, whereas O. korrae was amplified from 37% of the samples. There were distinct regions in the Mid-Atlantic in which either O. herpotricha or O. korrae was predominant. O. herpotricha was predominant in western Virginia, central North Carolina, Delaware, and eastern Maryland. However, O. korrae was predominant in central Maryland and Virginia as well as eastern Virginia and North Carolina. O. herpotricha was isolated from certain cultivars more frequently than O. korrae and vice versa. These survey results elucidate the geographic distribution of O. herpotricha and O. korrae throughout the Mid-Atlantic United States.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. herpotricha was recovered from 76% of sampled locations.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone1
Interactor
O. herpotrichaOphiosphaerella herpotrichae0pathogen
Outcome
O. herpotricha was recoverede0
Value
76%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At least one isolate of O. herpotricha was recovered from 76% of the locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. korrae was recovered from 73% of sampled locations.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone1
Interactor
O. korraeOphiosphaerella korraee0pathogen
Outcome
O. korrae was recoverede0
Value
73%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O. korrae was recovered from 73% of the locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. herpotricha was amplified from 55% of samples.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone1
Interactor
O. herpotrichaOphiosphaerella herpotrichae0pathogen
Outcome
O. herpotricha was amplifiede0
Value
55%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O. herpotricha was amplified from 55% of the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. korrae was amplified from 37% of samples.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone1
Interactor
O. korraeOphiosphaerella korraee0pathogen
Outcome
O. korrae was amplifiede0
Value
37%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O. korrae was amplified from 37% of the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1112 · show in text ↑
e1

“bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. herpotricha predominated in western Virginia, central North Carolina, Delaware, and eastern Maryland.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone1
Interactor
O. herpotrichaOphiosphaerella herpotrichae0pathogen
Outcome
O. herpotricha was predominante0
Setting
western Virginia, central North Carolina, Delaware, and eastern Marylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O. herpotricha was predominant in western Virginia, central North Carolina, Delaware, and eastern Maryland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1329 · show in text ↑
e1

“bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. korrae predominated in central Maryland and Virginia and eastern Virginia and North Carolina.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone1
Interactor
O. korraeOphiosphaerella korraee0pathogen
Outcome
O. korrae was predominante0
Setting
central Maryland and Virginia as well as eastern Virginia and North Carolinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O. korrae was predominant in central Maryland and Virginia as well as eastern Virginia and North Carolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1445 · show in text ↑
e1

“bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two pathogen species differed in frequency across certain cultivars.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone1
Material
certain cultivarse0
Interactor
O. herpotrichaOphiosphaerella herpotrichae0pathogen
Second interactor
O. korraeOphiosphaerella korraee0pathogen
Outcome
isolated from certain cultivars more frequentlye0
Direction
more frequentlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O. herpotricha was isolated from certain cultivars more frequently than O. korrae and vice versa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1543 · show in text ↑
e1

“bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–57 · show in text ↑