Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Weed Management Practices on Yield and Economics of Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) in Vertisols of Chhattisgarh

Kanta Kumar A. S. Rajput; P. R. Mirjha

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment entitled “Effect of weed management practices on yield and economics of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) in Vertisols of Chhattisgarh” was carried out during rabi season of 2020-21; at the Instructional Cum Research Farm, DKS College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bhatapara. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with 3 replication and 12 treatments viz.T1 - Weedy check, T2 -1 hand weeding at 20 DAS, T3- 1 hand hoeing at 20 DAS + 1 hand weeding at 40 DAS, T4 - pendimethalin @ 0.90 kg a.i.ha-1(PE), T5 -pendimethalin @ 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1 (PE)+1 hand weeding at 40 DAS, T6- pendimethalin @ 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1 (PE)+ imazathypr @ 100g a.i. ha-1(PoE), T7- pendimethalin @ 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1(PE) + isoproturon @ 1kg a.i. ha-1 (PoE), T8- pendimethalin @ 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1 (PE) + metsulfuron methyl @ 4g a.i. ha-1 (PoE), T9 - metsulfuron methyl @ 4g a.i. ha-1 (PoE), T10- imazathypr @ 100 g a.i. ha-1(PoE), T11 - isoproturon @ 1 kg a.i. ha-1 (PoE) and T12 - weed free. Linseed variety Indira alsi-32 (RLC-81) was sown on 09th November, 2020 at 30 × 10 cm spacing using 20 kg seed ha-1 with recommended level of nutrients 60, 30 and 30 kg N, P2O5 & K2O ha-1 respectively. Crop was harvested on 24th February, 2021. The result showed that the weed free (T8) recorded highest yield, which was statistically at par with 1 hand hoeing at 20 DAS + 1hand weeding at 40 DAS (T3). Highest benefit: cost ratio was recorded in pendimethalin @ 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1 (PE) + metsulfuron methyl @ 4g a.i. ha-1 (PoE) (T8) followed by metsulfuron methyl @ 4g a.i. ha-1 (PoE) (T9). Weedy check (T1) was the most inferior treatment which recorded 875 kg ha-1 and 1326 kg ha-1 grain and straw yield respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported weed-free T8 treatment had the highest linseed yield, statistically at par with hand hoeing plus hand weeding.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
weed free (T8)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
1 hand hoeing at 20 DAS + 1hand weeding at 40 DAS (T3)e0

Verbatim

e0

“the weed free (T8) recorded highest yield, which was statistically at par with 1 hand hoeing at 20 DAS + 1hand weeding at 40 DAS (T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pendimethalin plus metsulfuron methyl treatment had the highest benefit:cost ratio.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
pendimethalin @ 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1 (PE) + metsulfuron methyl @ 4g a.i. ha-1 (PoE) (T8)e0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
Higheste0
Comparator
metsulfuron methyl @ 4g a.i. ha-1 (PoE) (T9)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Highest benefit: cost ratio was recorded in pendimethalin @ 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1 (PE) + metsulfuron methyl @ 4g a.i. ha-1 (PoE) (T8) followed by metsulfuron methyl @ 4g a.i. ha-1 (PoE) (T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check produced 875 kg ha-1 grain yield and was the most inferior treatment.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
Weedy check (T1)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
most inferiore0
Value
875 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weedy check (T1) was the most inferior treatment which recorded 875 kg ha-1 and 1326 kg ha-1 grain and straw yield respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check produced 1326 kg ha-1 straw yield and was the most inferior treatment.

Taxon
linseedt0
Treatment
Weedy check (T1)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
most inferiore0
Value
1326 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weedy check (T1) was the most inferior treatment which recorded 875 kg ha-1 and 1326 kg ha-1 grain and straw yield respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

methyl · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.