Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Interactions Between Bacillus Spp., Pseudomonas Spp. and Cannabis sativa Promote Plant Growth

Dominique Comeau; Carole Balthazar; Amy Novinscak; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
69
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) deploy several mechanisms to improve plant health, growth and yield. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two Pseudomonas spp. strains and three Bacillus spp. strains used as single treatments and in consortia to improve the yield of Cannabis sativa and characterize the impact of these treatments on the diversity, structure and functions of the rhizosphere microbiome. Herein, we demonstrate a significant C. sativa yield increase up to 70% when inoculated with three different Pseudomonas spp./ Bacillus spp. consortia but not with single inoculation treatments. This growth-promoting effect was observed in two different commercial soil substrates commonly used to grow cannabis: Promix and Canna coco. Marker-based genomic analysis highlighted Bacillus spp. as the main modulator of the rhizosphere microbiome diversity and Pseudomonas spp. as being strongly associated with plant growth promotion. We describe an increase abundance of predicted PGPR metabolic pathways linked with growth-promoting interactions in C. sativa .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three Pseudomonas and Bacillus consortia increased Cannabis yield up to 70%, unlike single inoculations.

Taxon
C. sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
three different Pseudomonas spp./ Bacillus spp. consortiae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas spp.Pseudomonase0symbionte1
Second interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbionte1
Outcome
C. sativa yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
single inoculation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant C. sativa yield increase up to 70% when inoculated with three different Pseudomonas spp./ Bacillus spp. consortia but not with single inoculation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–625 · show in text ↑
e1

“improve the yield of Cannabis sativa and characterize the impact of these treatments on the diversity, structure and functions of the rhizosphere microbiome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single strain inoculations did not increase Cannabis yield.

Taxon
C. sativaCannabis sativae0
Treatment
single inoculation treatmentse0
Outcome
C. sativa yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant C. sativa yield increase up to 70% when inoculated with three different Pseudomonas spp./ Bacillus spp. consortia but not with single inoculation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–625 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus was the main modulator of rhizosphere microbiome diversity.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
rhizosphere microbiome diversitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marker-based genomic analysis highlighted Bacillus spp. as the main modulator of the rhizosphere microbiome diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas was strongly associated with plant growth promotion.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Interactor
Pseudomonas spp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth promotione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas spp. as being strongly associated with plant growth promotion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted growth promoting bacterial pathways were more abundant in the Cannabis rhizosphere.

Taxon
C. sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
predicted PGPR metabolic pathwayse0
Direction
increase abundancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We describe an increase abundance of predicted PGPR metabolic pathways linked with growth-promoting interactions in C. sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1090 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.