Paper · 2013 · Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development

EFFECT OF PLANT DENSITY OF FABA BEAN INTERCROPPED ON WHEAT AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS FOR BOTH CROPS

Sh.R. Abd El Zaher; R.A. Gadallah

20
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two experiment were carried out during the two growing seasonsof 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 at Giza Agric. Res. St. to study theeffect of plant density of faba bean intercropped on wheat andnitrogen fertilization on yield and its components for both crops. Asplit plots design with three replications was used. The main plotswere devoted to nitrogen fertilizer levels (60, 75 and 90 kg N/fad.Whereas, the sub plots were allocated for pattern systems P1,P2,P3(100 wheat 12.5%, 25% and 37.5% faba bean respectively. Theresults indicated that increased population of faba bean from 12.5 %to 37.5 of solid led to reduction for all study characters number ofspikes/m2, grain/ spike, weight of grains spike and 1000 grain, grainand straw yield/ fad of wheat in the combined data. The reduction ingrain and straw yield of wheat were estimated 5.84 and 6.47 for P1,10.09 and 8.82% for P213.33 and 13.53% for P3 respectively.Intercropping 100% of wheat with faba bean (P1) recorded the highestvalues of most yield components of faba bean, while the lowestvalues were observed by third density (P3). Seed and straw yield wereincreased by increased plant density of faba bean (P1 toP3) butreduced as compared with solid yield.This in seed and straw yieldfaba bean were 75.57 and 76.24 for(P1) 61.48 and 66.70 for (P2) 47.60 and 55.55 for (P3)respectively.Grain and seed yield of wheat with faba bean weresignificantly affect by nitrogen fertilizer levels. The highest values ofboth crops (95.24 and 48.75) were observed when added 90 kg N/fad.While the lowest values (85.63 and 29.33) with 60 kg N/fad of solidcrops. The highest of LER (1.53) MAI (4574.73) and MER (1.42)were observed (N3×P3) while the lowest was observed (N1×P1).The values ofaggressivity (Ag) for faba bean was positive whilewheat was negative it means that faba bean was dominated whilewheat was dominated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing faba bean density reduced wheat yield components.

Treatment
increased population of faba bean from 12.5 %to 37.5 of solide0
Interactor
faba beanVicia fabae0other
Outcome
number ofspikes/m2, grain/ spike, weight of grains spike and 1000 graine0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia faba
Vicia faba · InteractorRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased population of faba bean from 12.5 %to 37.5 of solid led to reduction for all study characters number ofspikes/m2, grain/ spike, weight of grains spike and 1000 grain, grainand straw yield/ fad of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing faba bean density reduced wheat grain yield.

Treatment
increased population of faba bean from 12.5 %to 37.5 of solide0
Interactor
faba beanVicia fabae0other
Outcome
grainand straw yield/ fad of wheate0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia faba
Vicia faba · InteractorRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased population of faba bean from 12.5 %to 37.5 of solid led to reduction for all study characters number ofspikes/m2, grain/ spike, weight of grains spike and 1000 grain, grainand straw yield/ fad of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain and straw yield reductions were reported for P1, P2 and P3.

Outcome
ingrain and straw yield of wheate0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
for P1,10.09 and 8.82% for P213.33 and 13.53% for P3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction ingrain and straw yield of wheat were estimated 5.84 and 6.47 for P1,10.09 and 8.82% for P213.33 and 13.53% for P3 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1 gave the highest values for most faba bean yield components.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Intercropping 100% of wheat with faba bean (P1)e0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0other
Outcome
most yield components of faba beane0
Direction
highestvaluese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping 100% of wheat with faba bean (P1) recorded the highestvalues of most yield components of faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1025 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 gave the lowest values for most faba bean yield components.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
third density (P3)e0
Outcome
lowestvaluese0
Direction
lowestvaluese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowestvalues were observed by third density (P3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean seed yield increased with plant density.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
increased plant density of faba bean (P1 toP3)e0
Outcome
Seede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
solid yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed and straw yield wereincreased by increased plant density of faba bean (P1 toP3) butreduced as compared with solid yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean straw yield increased with plant density.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
increased plant density of faba bean (P1 toP3)e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
solid yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed and straw yield wereincreased by increased plant density of faba bean (P1 toP3) butreduced as compared with solid yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped faba bean seed yield was lower than solid crop yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
increased plant density of faba bean (P1 toP3)e0
Outcome
Seede0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
solid yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed and straw yield wereincreased by increased plant density of faba bean (P1 toP3) butreduced as compared with solid yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped faba bean straw yield was lower than solid crop yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
increased plant density of faba bean (P1 toP3)e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
solid yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed and straw yield wereincreased by increased plant density of faba bean (P1 toP3) butreduced as compared with solid yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer levels significantly affected wheat grain yield.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer levelse0
Interactor
faba beanVicia fabae0other
Outcome
Grain and seed yield of wheate0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia faba
Vicia faba · InteractorRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and seed yield of wheat with faba bean weresignificantly affect by nitrogen fertilizer levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer levels significantly affected faba bean seed yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer levelse0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0other
Outcome
seed yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and seed yield of wheat with faba bean weresignificantly affect by nitrogen fertilizer levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1441 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg N/fad, the highest wheat crop value was 95.24.

Treatment
90 kg N/fade0
Outcome
values ofboth cropse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
95.24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values ofboth crops (95.24 and 48.75) were observed when added 90 kg N/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg N/fad, the highest faba bean crop value was 48.75.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
90 kg N/fade0
Outcome
values ofboth cropse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
48.75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values ofboth crops (95.24 and 48.75) were observed when added 90 kg N/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 kg N/fad the lowest wheat crop value was 85.63.

Treatment
60 kg N/fade0
Outcome
valuese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
85.63e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest values (85.63 and 29.33) with 60 kg N/fad of solidcrops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 kg N/fad the lowest faba bean crop value was 29.33.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
60 kg N/fade0
Outcome
valuese0
Direction
loweste0
Value
29.33e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest values (85.63 and 29.33) with 60 kg N/fad of solidcrops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3×P3 had the highest LER at 1.53.

Treatment
N3×P3e0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.53e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest of LER (1.53) MAI (4574.73) and MER (1.42)were observed (N3×P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3×P3 had the highest MAI at 4574.73.

Treatment
N3×P3e0
Outcome
MAIe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4574.73e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest of LER (1.53) MAI (4574.73) and MER (1.42)were observed (N3×P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3×P3 had the highest MER at 1.42.

Treatment
N3×P3e0
Outcome
MERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.42e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest of LER (1.53) MAI (4574.73) and MER (1.42)were observed (N3×P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N1×P1 had the lowest intercropping indices.

Treatment
N1×P1e0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest was observed (N1×P1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1717 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggressivity was positive for faba bean and negative for wheat, interpreted as faba bean dominance.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0other
Outcome
aggressivity (Ag)e0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The values ofaggressivity (Ag) for faba bean was positive whilewheat was negative it means that faba bean was dominated whilewheat was dominated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1862 · show in text ↑

Vicia faba · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

density · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 41 positive, 16 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.