Paper · 2021 · Nematology

Meloidogyne enterolobii development and reproduction in tomato plants treated with resistance inducers

Juliana de O. Silva; Camilla M. Oliveira; Renê G. da S. Carneiro; et al.

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Meloidogyne enterolobii is a species capable of overcoming plant resistance moderated by the Mi -1 gene, which is effective against most species of root-knot nematode. This study evaluated the effect of induced resistance in tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum ‘H-9553’) with the Mi -1 gene against the development and reproduction of M. enterolobii . Seedlings of tomato ‘H-9553’ were transplanted into pots, inoculated with 2000 eggs and second-stage juveniles (J2) of M. enterolobii and treated with Acibenzolar-S-Methyl, Bacillus subtilis , B. subtilis + B. licheniformis + Trichoderma longibrachiatum and extract of Reynoutria sachalinensis . The plants were collected at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 days after inoculation (DAI) for the analyses of nematode penetration and development, and at 30 DAI for nematode reproduction. The use of B. subtilis increased fresh root weight when compared to the other treatments (20 DAI). There was a reduction in penetration of J2 in the roots of plants subjected to different resistance inducers. The population density of M. enterolobii was significantly reduced only when plants were treated with R. sachalinensis , indicating it as a potential resistance-inducing agent in tomato plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis increased fresh root weight of tomato plants compared to the other treatments at 20 DAI.

Treatment
The use of B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0other
Outcome
fresh root weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
20 DAIe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of B. subtilis increased fresh root weight when compared to the other treatments (20 DAI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance inducers reduced penetration of M. enterolobii J2 in the roots of tomato plants.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
different resistance inducerse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne enterolobiiMeloidogyne enterolobiit1pest
Outcome
penetration of J2e0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne enterolobii
Meloidogyne enterolobii · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJeffrey W. Lotz, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a reduction in penetration of J2 in the roots of plants subjected to different resistance inducers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–69 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne enterolobii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The population density of M. enterolobii was significantly reduced only in tomato plants treated with Reynoutria sachalinensis extract.

Treatment
R. sachalinensise0
Interactor
M. enterolobiiMeloidogyne enterolobiie0pest
Outcome
population density of M. enterolobiie0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne enterolobii
Meloidogyne enterolobii · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJeffrey W. Lotz, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population density of M. enterolobii was significantly reduced only when plants were treated with R. sachalinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–69 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

resistance inducer · Meloidogyne enterolobii · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.