Paper · 2021 · Oikos

Interaction network structure and spatial patterns influence invasiveness and invasibility in a stochastic model of plant communities

Nicole L. Kinlock; Stephan B. Munch

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The factors governing invasiveness and invasibility are important for understanding invasions in plant communities, but most previous work does not incorporate network‐level interaction structure. We addressed this gap by simulating perennial plant communities at multiple life stages that varied in species richness and interaction network structures (transitive and intransitive), characteristics associated with species coexistence, using a stochastic lattice model that incorporated local competition, facilitation, and dispersal. Resident communities were invaded with alien species that varied in their fecundity, dispersal, and competitive abilities. We found that community structures that are known to promote coexistence also increased invasibility; communities with intransitive interaction networks on the whole were more invasible than transitive communities. However, the interaction between species richness and network structure was complex, as intransitive communities with few species were relatively resistant and transitive communities with many species were relatively invasible. Thus, simple rules linking intransitivity and diversity may not reflect the complex relationships between community structure and dynamics that occur in more realistic spatial systems. Spatial patterns of clustering and segregation were associated with higher invasibility and successful invaders intensified these patterns in communities, particularly at large spatial scales. Invasiveness and alien species abundance were associated with species‐level characteristics (fecundity and dispersal), but community‐level characteristics were also important, particularly competitive tolerance to the resident community. These results emphasize the importance of a community‐level approach, involving network‐level structure and spatial patterns, in adding nuance to our understanding of invasions in plant communities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulated plant communities, community structures known to promote coexistence also increased invasibility.

Taxon
plant communitiest0
Treatment
community structures that are known to promote coexistencee0
Outcome
invasibilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“community structures that are known to promote coexistence also increased invasibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulated plant communities, communities with intransitive interaction networks were on the whole more invasible than transitive communities.

Taxon
plant communitiest0
Treatment
intransitive interaction networkse0
Outcome
invasiblee0
Direction
more invasiblee0
Comparator
transitive communitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“communities with intransitive interaction networks on the whole were more invasible than transitive communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulations, intransitive communities with few species were relatively resistant to invasion.

Taxon
plant communitiest0
Outcome
relatively resistante0
Qualifier
intransitive communities with few speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“intransitive communities with few species were relatively resistant and transitive communities with many species were relatively invasible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulations, transitive communities with many species were relatively invasible.

Taxon
plant communitiest0
Outcome
relatively invasiblee0
Qualifier
transitive communities with many speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“intransitive communities with few species were relatively resistant and transitive communities with many species were relatively invasible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulated plant communities, spatial patterns of clustering and segregation were associated with higher invasibility.

Taxon
plant communitiest0
Treatment
Spatial patterns of clustering and segregatione0
Outcome
invasibilitye0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Spatial patterns of clustering and segregation were associated with higher invasibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulations, successful invaders intensified the clustering and segregation patterns in communities, particularly at large spatial scales.

Taxon
plant communitiest0
Outcome
intensified these patternse0
Qualifier
particularly at large spatial scalese0

Verbatim

e0

“successful invaders intensified these patterns in communities, particularly at large spatial scales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1477 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulations, invasiveness and alien species abundance were associated with species-level fecundity and dispersal.

Taxon
plant communitiest0
Treatment
fecundity and dispersale1
Outcome
Invasiveness and alien species abundancee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Invasiveness and alien species abundance were associated with species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“fecundity and dispersal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1595 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulations, community-level characteristics, particularly competitive tolerance to the resident community, were also important for invasiveness and alien species abundance.

Taxon
plant communitiest0
Treatment
competitive tolerance to the resident communitye1
Outcome
Invasiveness and alien species abundancee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Invasiveness and alien species abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“particularly competitive tolerance to the resident community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1715 · show in text ↑