Paper · 2021 · Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology

Genetic parameters and path analysis for root yield of cassava under drought and early harvest

Carlos Roberto Silva de Oliveira; Jerônimo Constantino Borel; Danilo Alves Pereira; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters and identify traits that contribute to early yield in Manihot esculenta Crantz. Ten traits were evaluated in two experiments, one with 138 genotypes and the other with 133, using a completely randomized block design with four replications. All genotype effects were significant. The accuracy was high for the traits, except leaf retention (0.57), and reliability ranged from 0.33 to 0.75. Root weight (RW) and number of roots (NR) showed the highest selection effectiveness (CV r ), although the estimate was less than 1. Moreover, RW and NR obtained high genetic correlation (0.70). Path analysis showed that only number of roots had a significant direct effect on root weight (0.49), and no indirect effect was found. Therefore, accessions exhibited sufficient genetic variability, and indirect selection based on early evaluation of number of roots can be applied in cassava breeding for fresh root yield, increasing gain over time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All genotype effects were significant.

Taxon
Manihot esculenta CrantzManihot esculentae0
Material
genotypee1
Outcome
genotype effectse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manihot esculenta Crantz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“All genotype effects were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–342 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trait accuracy was high except for leaf retention, which had accuracy 0.57.

Taxon
Manihot esculenta CrantzManihot esculentae0
Outcome
accuracye1
Direction
highe1
Value
0.57e1
Qualifier
except leaf retentione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manihot esculenta Crantz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“The accuracy was high for the traits, except leaf retention (0.57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–410 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reliability ranged from 0.33 to 0.75.

Taxon
Manihot esculenta CrantzManihot esculentae0
Outcome
reliabilitye1
Value
0.33 to 0.75e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manihot esculenta Crantz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“reliability ranged from 0.33 to 0.75”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–452 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root weight had among the highest selection effectiveness, although the estimate was below one.

Taxon
Manihot esculenta CrantzManihot esculentae0
Organ / stage
Root weighte1
Outcome
selection effectivenesse1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
less than 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manihot esculenta Crantz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root weight (RW) and number of roots (NR) showed the highest selection effectiveness (CV r ), although the estimate was less than 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–585 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of roots had among the highest selection effectiveness, although the estimate was below one.

Taxon
Manihot esculenta CrantzManihot esculentae0
Organ / stage
number of rootse1
Outcome
selection effectivenesse1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
less than 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manihot esculenta Crantz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root weight (RW) and number of roots (NR) showed the highest selection effectiveness (CV r ), although the estimate was less than 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–585 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root weight and root number had a high genetic correlation of 0.70.

Taxon
Manihot esculenta CrantzManihot esculentae0
Organ / stage
Root weighte2
Outcome
genetic correlatione1
Direction
highe1
Value
0.70e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manihot esculenta Crantz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“RW and NR obtained high genetic correlation (0.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–647 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root weight (RW) and number of roots (NR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–495 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of roots had a significant direct effect on root weight of 0.49.

Taxon
Manihot esculenta CrantzManihot esculentae0
Organ / stage
number of rootse1
Outcome
direct effect on root weighte1
Value
0.49e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manihot esculenta Crantz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“only number of roots had a significant direct effect on root weight (0.49)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–749 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Path analysis found no indirect effect on root weight.

Taxon
Manihot esculenta CrantzManihot esculentae0
Organ / stage
number of rootse2
Outcome
indirect effecte1
Direction
noe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manihot esculenta Crantz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“no indirect effect was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–783 · show in text ↑
e2

“Path analysis showed that only number of roots had a significant direct effect on root weight (0.49), and no indirect effect was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–783 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The accessions showed sufficient genetic variability.

Taxon
Manihot esculenta CrantzManihot esculentae0
Material
accessionse1
Outcome
genetic variabilitye1
Direction
sufficiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manihot esculenta Crantz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“accessions exhibited sufficient genetic variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–847 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend indirect selection using early root number evaluation for cassava fresh root yield to increase gain over time.

Outcome
indirect selection based on early evaluation of number of rootse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava breeding for fresh root yield, increasing gain over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“indirect selection based on early evaluation of number of roots can be applied in cassava breeding for fresh root yield, increasing gain over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–999 · show in text ↑