Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Response of Crops to Conservation Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilization under Different Agroecological Conditions

Irena Jug; Bojana Brozović; Boris Đurđević; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Effects of soil tillage (CTconventional, SS-subsoiling, CH-chiselling, DH-disk-harrowing and NT-no-till) and nitrogen rate (reduced N1, optimal N2 and luxury N3) on yield and yield components of maize and winter wheat in two different agricultural subregions of Croatia (Magadenovac and Cacinci site), were studied in the years 2013–2014 as part of a long-term experiment. Maize yield and yield components were influenced by site properties, tillage and nitrogen treatments. The highest yields and yield components were recorded at the Magadenovac site with N2 and N3. The lowest values of the yield and yield components of maize were recorded on NT and were significantly lower than CT, SS, CH and DH, among which no significant differences were recorded. Winter wheat yield and yield components were affected by site properties and nitrogen rates while soil tillage treatments only had an influence on grain and straw yield and plant height. Winter wheat achieved maximum yield and yield components on a N3 and N2 and at the Magadenovac site. Winter wheat grain yield decreased in the following order: SS > DH > CH > NT > CT. The obtained results indicate the importance of optimal nitrogen fertilization and the possibility of the implementation of conservation tillage for maize and winter wheat production in different agroecological conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield and components were influenced by site, tillage and nitrogen

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
tillage and nitrogen treatmentse0
Outcome
Maize yield and yield components were influenced by site properties, tillage and nitrogen treatments.e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yield and yield components were influenced by site properties, tillage and nitrogen treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–474 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield and components were highest at Magadenovac with N2 and N3

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse2
Outcome
The highest yields and yield components were recorded at the Magadenovac site with N2 and N3.e0
Setting
Magadenovace0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yields and yield components were recorded at the Magadenovac site with N2 and N3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maize yield and yield components were influenced by site properties, tillage and nitrogen treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till maize yield and components were lowest and significantly below other tillage treatments

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
The lowest values of the yield and yield components of maize were recorded on NT and were significantly lower than CT, SS, CH and DHe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CT, SS, CH and DHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest values of the yield and yield components of maize were recorded on NT and were significantly lower than CT, SS, CH and DH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT, SS, CH and DH had no significant maize yield differences

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
CT, SS, CH and DHe2
Outcome
among which no significant differences were recorded.e0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among which no significant differences were recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–756 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest values of the yield and yield components of maize were recorded on NT and were significantly lower than CT, SS, CH and DH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–701 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest values of the yield and yield components of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–629 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield and components varied with site and nitrogen

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
nitrogen ratese0
Outcome
Winter wheat yield and yield components were affected by site properties and nitrogen ratese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat yield and yield components were affected by site properties and nitrogen rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–848 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage influenced wheat grain and straw yield and plant height

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
soil tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
soil tillage treatments only had an influence on grain and straw yield and plant height.e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil tillage treatments only had an influence on grain and straw yield and plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter wheat yield and yield components were affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–810 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield and components reached maxima with N3 and N2 at Magadenovac

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
Winter wheat achieved maximum yield and yield components on a N3 and N2 and at the Magadenovac site.e0
Setting
Magadenovace0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat achieved maximum yield and yield components on a N3 and N2 and at the Magadenovac site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1044 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield ranked SS above DH above CH above NT above CT

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
Winter wheat grain yield decreased in the following order: SS > DH > CH > NT > CT.e0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat grain yield decreased in the following order: SS > DH > CH > NT > CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1127 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal nitrogen and conservation tillage are indicated for maize and wheat production

Taxon
maize and winter wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Outcome
importance of optimal nitrogen fertilization and the possibility of the implementation of conservation tillage for maize and winter wheat production in different agroecological conditions.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“importance of optimal nitrogen fertilization and the possibility of the implementation of conservation tillage for maize and winter wheat production in different agroecological conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1350 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.