Paper · 2021 · The Plant Genome

Genomic prediction of preliminary yield trials in chickpea: Effect of functional annotation of SNPs and environment

Yongle Li; Pradeep Ruperao; Jacqueline Batley; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
25
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Achieving yield potential in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is limited by many constraints that include biotic and abiotic stresses. Combining next-generation sequencing technology with advanced statistical modeling has the potential to increase genetic gain efficiently. Whole genome resequencing data was obtained from 315 advanced chickpea breeding lines from the Australian chickpea breeding program resulting in more than 298,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) discovered. Analysis of population structure revealed a distinct group of breeding lines with many alleles that are absent from recently released Australian cultivars. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using these Australian breeding lines identified 20 SNPs significantly associated with grain yield in multiple field environments. A reduced level of nucleotide diversity and extended linkage disequilibrium suggested that some regions in these chickpea genomes may have been through selective breeding for yield or other traits. A large introgression segment that introduced from C. echinospermum for phytophthora root rot resistance was identified on chromosome 6, yet it also has unintended consequences of reducing yield due to linkage drag. We further investigated the effect of genotype by environment interaction on genomic prediction of yield. We found that the training set had better prediction accuracy when phenotyped under conditions relevant to the targeted environments. We also investigated the effect of SNP functional annotation on prediction accuracy using different subsets of SNPs based on their genomic locations: regulatory regions, exome, and alternative splice sites. Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resequencing 315 chickpea breeding lines discovered more than 298,000 SNPs.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
advanced chickpea breeding linese0
Outcome
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) discoverede0
Value
more than 298,000e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole genome resequencing data was obtained from 315 advanced chickpea breeding lines from the Australian chickpea breeding program resulting in more than 298,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) discovered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–484 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population structure revealed a distinct breeding-line group with alleles absent from recent Australian cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
distinct group of breeding lines with many alleles that are absent from recently released Australian cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of population structure revealed a distinct group of breeding lines with many alleles that are absent from recently released Australian cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea breeding lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GWAS identified 20 SNPs associated with chickpea grain yield across multiple field environments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Gene
SNPse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
20 SNPse0
Setting
multiple field environmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using these Australian breeding lines identified 20 SNPs significantly associated with grain yield in multiple field environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea breeding lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nucleotide diversity and extended linkage disequilibrium suggested selection in some chickpea genomic regions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Gene
regions in these chickpea genomese0
Outcome
selective breeding for yield or other traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A reduced level of nucleotide diversity and extended linkage disequilibrium suggested that some regions in these chickpea genomes may have been through selective breeding for yield or other traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1008 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A C. echinospermum introgression for phytophthora root rot resistance was identified on chromosome 6.

Taxon
C. echinospermumCicer echinospermume0
Interactor
phytophthoraPhytophthorae0pathogen
Gene
chromosome 6e0
Outcome
large introgression segmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A large introgression segment that introduced from C. echinospermum for phytophthora root rot resistance was identified on chromosome 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1144 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chromosome 6 C. echinospermum introgression reduced chickpea yield through linkage drag.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
C. echinospermume0
Gene
chromosome 6e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A large introgression segment that introduced from C. echinospermum for phytophthora root rot resistance was identified on chromosome 6, yet it also has unintended consequences of reducing yield due to linkage drag.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea breeding lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Training sets phenotyped under conditions relevant to target environments had better yield prediction accuracy.

Outcome
prediction accuracye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
conditions relevant to the targeted environmentse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“We found that the training set had better prediction accuracy when phenotyped under conditions relevant to the targeted environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1464 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain-yield prediction accuracy.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
prediction accuracy for grain yielde0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0
Comparator
whole SNP datasete0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea breeding lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 · show in text ↑