Paper · 1979 · Japanese Journal of Farm Work Research

Studies on the Development of a Mechanical Harvester for Processing Tomato

Hiroshi ARIMA

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

For many years, mechanical harvesting of processing tomatoes was considered to be impossible in Japan, because of the intensive cultivation in small and narrow fields, and the wide variation in fruit maturation caused by rain and inconstant weather. Therefore, Japan is lagging far behind the West in the study of mechanical harvesting.Recently, due to Japan's rapid industrial development, labor for harvesting tomato is becoming more difficult and expensive to procure. In addition, the international liberalization of trade requires lower harvesting costs.In response this situation, a study was conducted from 1968 to 1978 at the Shinshu University; 1) to investigate time foctors in the traditional hand-picked harvest and to estimate the propriety of mechanical harvesting, 2) to measure the physical properties of fruits, and mechanical damages in their harvesting, 3) to investigate structures of vines and field conditions, 4) to design and test compact machines, and 5) to discuss the utility of these machines.In this paper, 1) was described and its result, in summary are as follows.(1) Average working time by the traditional hand picking methods was calculated with successive data from the Department of Agriculture; and today, working time has reached 142.4hrs/10a and occupies 52.2% of total working time for processing tomato culture.(2) Simplification of the hand picking motion (therblig), does not increase picking efficiency significantly.(3) In order to estimate the practicality both of the once-over harvest method and the combination of hand selection and once-over method, the yield by each method was compared to the yield by the traditional hand picking method, using varieties of Wasedaruma and Chico III. The ratios of yields by three mathods were estimated using both the field test data and histrical data. It was found that in proportion to the high yield of the effective but time-consuming traditional method, the once-over harvest produced a yield of about 60-70%, and the combination method produced a yield of about 75-85%.It seems that adoption of the once-over principle to Japanese fields leaves some difficult problems behind us. But as the suitable varieties for mechanical harvesting are still developing, the fully mechanical or the semi-mechanical harvest method can soon be implemented in place of traditional hand picking method in various areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand picking working time for processing tomato reached 142.4 hrs/10a.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Outcome
working timee0
Value
142.4hrs/10ae0

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“working time has reached 142.4hrs/10a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand picking accounts for 52.2% of the total working time for processing tomato culture.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Outcome
total working timee0
Value
52.2%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“occupies 52.2% of total working time for processing tomato culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simplifying the hand picking motion does not increase picking efficiency significantly.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
Simplification of the hand picking motione0
Outcome
picking efficiencye0
Direction
does not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Simplification of the hand picking motion (therblig), does not increase picking efficiency significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The once-over harvest produced a yield of about 60-70% of the traditional hand picking method.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
once-over harveste0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
about 60-70%e0
Comparator
traditional hand picking methode1

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“the once-over harvest produced a yield of about 60-70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2000 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the yield by the traditional hand picking method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of hand selection and once-over method produced a yield of about 75-85% of the traditional hand picking method.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
combination methode0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
about 75-85%e0
Comparator
traditional hand picking methode1

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combination method produced a yield of about 75-85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2061 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the yield by the traditional hand picking method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1689 · show in text ↑