Abstract
Sowing date is of great importance in sugar beet production, especially in optimal years with no late spring frosts. For this reason, a great deal of attention needs to be devoted to this factor. A trial with six sowing dates was established at the Rimski Sancevi Experiment Field of the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops in Novi Sad. The following sowing dates and their influence on root yield and technological quality were studied: 1st sowing date - March, 10, 2nd sowing date - March, 17, 3rd sowing date -March, 26 4th sowing date - april, 5, 5th sowing date - April, 10, and 6th sowing date - April, 15. The cultivars Mara, Lara and Sara were used. On average over the three study years, all the cultivars had the highest yield on the first sowing date. In relation to the other sowing dates, the yield on the first date was higher by 8.11 tha'1 (12.2%). A significant decrease of yield was recorded on optimal sowing dates with the cultivars Mara, while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant. Variation of sugar content was not correlated with sowing dates. Root yield had the dominant influence on sugar yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The first sowing date gave the highest root yield across cultivars and years.
- Taxon
- Sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- first sowing datee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- On average over the three study yearse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On average over the three study years, all the cultivars had the highest yield on the first sowing date.”
t0“Sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
First-date yield exceeded other sowing dates by 8.11 tha'1 (12.2%).
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- first datee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 8.11 tha'1 (12.2%)e0
- Comparator
- other sowing datese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In relation to the other sowing dates, the yield on the first date was higher by 8.11 tha'1 (12.2%).”
t0“Sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Mara yield decreased significantly on optimal sowing dates.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Marae0
- Treatment
- optimal sowing datese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A significant decrease of yield was recorded on optimal sowing dates with the cultivars Mara”
t0“Sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Lara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Larae0
- Outcome
- decreasee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant.”
t0“Sugar beet”
t1“decrease of yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Sara yield decrease on optimal sowing dates was not significant.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Sarae0
- Outcome
- decreasee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while with the other two cultivars (Lara and Sara), the decrease was not significant.”
t0“Sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar content variation was uncorrelated with sowing dates.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- sowing datese0
- Outcome
- sugar contente0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Variation of sugar content was not correlated with sowing dates.”
t0“Sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Root yield was the dominant contributor to sugar yield.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Comparator
- Root yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root yield had the dominant influence on sugar yield.”
t0“Sugar beet”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.