Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Soil density, soil moisture content and maize yield using No-till technology of cultivation

V K Dridiger; R G Gadzhiumarov

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The research was carried out at the experimental field of the North Caucasus Federal Research Center. In the field, years of experience, founded in 2012, in crop rotation of soybean-winter wheat-sunflower-corn all crops cultivated on the recommended scientific institutions technology soil treatment, and these same crops in the same crop turnover has grown by No-till technology. The recommended technology of maize cultivation consisted of soil double tillage by the heavy disk tools to the depth of 0.120-0.140 m immediately after harvesting the previous sunflower, winter plowing at 0.200-0.220 m, early spring harrowing, pre-sowing cultivation and sowing with an Optima seeder. In the No-till technology, the soil was not treated and ten days before corn sowing, the plots were sprayed with a continuous herbicide Rap 600 at a dose of 2 l/ha. The research showed that better accumulation and conservation of moisture can be provided during the flowering of maize with the content in the soil layer of 1.5 m at the depth of 34 mm, or 18.1% more moisture than usage of the technology with tillage which is recommended by scientific institutions. It contributes to a significant increase of 0.42 t/ha, or 12.0% in crop yield by using this technology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till cultivation conserved 34 mm or 18.1% more moisture at maize flowering than recommended tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
floweringe0
Treatment
No-till technologye1
Outcome
moisturee0
Direction
moree0
Value
34 mme0
Qualifier
18.1%e0
Comparator
technology with tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowering of maize with the content in the soil layer of 1.5 m at the depth of 34 mm, or 18.1% more moisture than usage of the technology with tillage which is recommended by scientific institutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the No-till technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till cultivation increased maize yield by 0.42 t/ha or 12.0%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
No-till technologye1
Outcome
crop yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
0.42 t/hae2
Qualifier
12.0%e2
Comparator
technology with tillagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowering of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–976 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the No-till technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–717 · show in text ↑
e2

“It contributes to a significant increase of 0.42 t/ha, or 12.0% in crop yield by using this technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1260 · show in text ↑
e3

“technology with tillage which is recommended by scientific institutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1156 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.