Abstract
Three varieties of pearlmillet were tested under three moisture conservation practices during kharif 2018 and 2019 at Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpur. Variety 'Krishna-834' provided the highest yield with substantial benefit over 'Anand' and 'Krishna-4311' varieties. One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DAS gave the highest growth, yield attributes, grain yield and net return but lowest splash loss as compared to ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practices. Interaction between varieties and moisture conservation practices was found to be non-significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Variety Krishna-834 gave the highest pearl millet yield, with substantial benefit over Anand and Krishna-4311.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanuse0 - Material
- Krishna-834e1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- Anande1
- Setting
- Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three varieties of pearlmillet were tested under three moisture conservation practices during kharif 2018 and 2019 at Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpur”
e1“Variety 'Krishna-834' provided the highest yield with substantial benefit over 'Anand' and 'Krishna-4311' varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
One weeding and hoeing plus organic residue mulch at 4 t/ha gave the highest growth, yield attributes and grain yield in pearl millet compared with ridging and furrowing or one weeding and hoeing alone.
- Taxon
- pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
- Treatment
- One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DASe2
- Outcome
- growth, yield attributes, grain yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Comparator
- ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practicese2
- Setting
- Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three varieties of pearlmillet were tested under three moisture conservation practices during kharif 2018 and 2019 at Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpur”
e2“One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DAS gave the highest growth, yield attributes, grain yield and net return but lowest splash loss as compared to ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practices”
Claim · model-written summary
The same mulch treatment gave the highest net return in pearl millet compared with ridging and furrowing or one weeding and hoeing alone.
- Taxon
- pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
- Treatment
- One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DASe2
- Outcome
- net returne2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Comparator
- ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practicese2
- Setting
- Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three varieties of pearlmillet were tested under three moisture conservation practices during kharif 2018 and 2019 at Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpur”
e2“One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DAS gave the highest growth, yield attributes, grain yield and net return but lowest splash loss as compared to ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practices”
Claim · model-written summary
The same mulch treatment gave the lowest splash loss compared with ridging and furrowing or one weeding and hoeing alone.
- Taxon
- pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
- Treatment
- One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DASe2
- Outcome
- splash losse2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Comparator
- ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practicese2
- Setting
- Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three varieties of pearlmillet were tested under three moisture conservation practices during kharif 2018 and 2019 at Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpur”
e2“One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DAS gave the highest growth, yield attributes, grain yield and net return but lowest splash loss as compared to ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practices”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction between pearl millet varieties and moisture conservation practices was not significant.
- Taxon
- pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
- Outcome
- Interaction between varieties and moisture conservation practicese3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three varieties of pearlmillet were tested under three moisture conservation practices during kharif 2018 and 2019 at Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm, Kanpur”
e3“Interaction between varieties and moisture conservation practices was found to be non-significant”
The same questions in other papers
mulching · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →herbicide · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.