Paper · 2021 · Forests

Assessing Tree Coverage and the Direct and Mediation Effect of Tree Diversity on Carbon Storage through Stand Structure in Homegardens of Southwestern Bangladesh

Md Mizanur Rahman; Gauranga Kumar Kundu; Md Enamul Kabir; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Dealing with two major challenges, climate change mitigation and biodiversity loss, under the same management program, is more noteworthy than addressing these two separately. Homegardens, a sustainable agroforestry system and a home of diverse species, can be a possible choice to address these two issues. In this study, we assessed tree coverage, and the direct and indirect effects of tree diversity on carbon storage in different carbon pools through stand structure in homegardens of southwestern Bangladesh, using Sentinel 2 and field inventory data from 40 homesteads in eight villages. An unsupervised classification method was followed to assess homegardens’ tree coverage. We found a high tree coverage (24.34% of total area of Dighalia) in homesteads, with a high overall accuracy of 96.52%. The biomass and soil organic carbon (p < 0.05) varied significantly among the eight villages, while total carbon stock did not vary significantly (p > 0.05). Shannon diversity had both direct and indirect effects on biomass carbon, upper layer soil organic carbon and total carbon storage, while basal area mediated the indirect effect. Both basal area and tree height had positive effects on biomass carbon and total carbon storage, with basal area having the strongest effect. These findings suggest that we must maintain higher diversity and tree height in order to maximize and sustain carbon storage, where tree diversity increases stand basal area and improves total carbon storage (including soil organic) in homegardens. Therefore, privately managed homegardens could be a potential nature-based solution for biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation in Bangladesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Homegarden tree coverage was 24.34% in Dighalia.

Taxon
treee0
Outcome
tree coveragee0
Value
24.34% of total area of Dighaliae0

Verbatim

e0

“high tree coverage (24.34% of total area of Dighalia) in homesteads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–762 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree coverage classification achieved 96.52% accuracy.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
overall accuracye0t0
Value
96.52%e0t0

Verbatim

e0

“high overall accuracy of 96.52%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Tree Coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass carbon varied significantly among eight villages.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
biomasse0t0

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass and soil organic carbon (p < 0.05) varied significantly among the eight villages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Tree Coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon varied significantly among eight villages.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0t0

Verbatim

e0

“soil organic carbon (p < 0.05) varied significantly among the eight villages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Tree Coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total carbon stock did not vary significantly among villages.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
total carbon stocke0t0

Verbatim

e0

“total carbon stock did not vary significantly (p > 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Tree Coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shannon diversity had direct and indirect effects on biomass carbon and upper soil organic carbon.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
biomass carbon, upper layer soil organic carbon and total carbon storagee0t0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Shannon diversity had both direct and indirect effects on biomass carbon, upper layer soil organic carbon and total carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Tree Coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal area mediated the indirect diversity effect.

Taxon
treet0
Outcome
indirect effecte0t0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“basal area mediated the indirect effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“Assessing Tree Coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal area and tree height had positive effects on carbon storage.

Taxon
treee0
Outcome
biomass carbon and total carbon storagee0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Both basal area and tree height had positive effects on biomass carbon and total carbon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1236 · show in text ↑