Paper · 2014 · Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences

Influence of Nutrient Management Systems on Yield Attributes of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var Beit Alpha) Cultivated in Polyhouse Conditions

S. Arun; R. Jaya Kumar

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in two consequent years Viz., 2011 and 2012 to study the effect nutrient management systems on growth, yield and quality attributes of cucumber (var Beit Alpha) cultivated under Polyhouse condition. The results revealed that the application of 125% RDF applied through water soluble fertilizer and foliar application of Micro nutrients significantly influenced Yield attributes Viz., Fruit Length (cms), Fruit Diameter (cms) and Number of fruitsper Vine of cucumber cultivated in Polyhouse condition. The maximum Fruit Length (16.8 and 18.2 cms), Fruit diameter (4.6 and 5.3 cms) and Number of Fruits (39.1 and 37.2) were recorded in the treatment G3 M4 (125% RDF through Water Soluble fertigation+ Foliar application of Micronutrient) during the years 2011 and 2012 respectively. The lowest values for the above parameters were recorded in Control (6.2 and 8.2 cms for Fruit Length, 2.5 and 2.7 cms for Fruit Diameter and 5.9 and 8.0 for Number of fruits per vineduring the years 2011 and 2012 respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined G3 M4 treatment produced maximum cucumber fruit length of 16.8 and 18.2 cms in 2011 and 2012.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
G3 M4 (125% RDF through Water Soluble fertigation+ Foliar application of Micronutrient)e0
Outcome
Fruit Lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
16.8 and 18.2 cmse0
Setting
Polyhouset0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum Fruit Length (16.8 and 18.2 cms), Fruit diameter (4.6 and 5.3 cms) and Number of Fruits (39.1 and 37.2) were recorded in the treatment G3 M4 (125% RDF through Water Soluble fertigation+ Foliar application of Micronutrient) during the years 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var Beit Alpha) Cultivated in Polyhouse Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined G3 M4 treatment produced maximum cucumber fruit diameter of 4.6 and 5.3 cms in 2011 and 2012.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
G3 M4 (125% RDF through Water Soluble fertigation+ Foliar application of Micronutrient)e0
Outcome
Fruit diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.6 and 5.3 cmse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum Fruit Length (16.8 and 18.2 cms), Fruit diameter (4.6 and 5.3 cms) and Number of Fruits (39.1 and 37.2) were recorded in the treatment G3 M4 (125% RDF through Water Soluble fertigation+ Foliar application of Micronutrient) during the years 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var Beit Alpha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined G3 M4 treatment produced maximum cucumber fruit number of 39.1 and 37.2 in 2011 and 2012.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
G3 M4 (125% RDF through Water Soluble fertigation+ Foliar application of Micronutrient)e0
Outcome
Number of Fruitse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
39.1 and 37.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum Fruit Length (16.8 and 18.2 cms), Fruit diameter (4.6 and 5.3 cms) and Number of Fruits (39.1 and 37.2) were recorded in the treatment G3 M4 (125% RDF through Water Soluble fertigation+ Foliar application of Micronutrient) during the years 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var Beit Alpha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control cucumbers had the lowest fruit length, 6.2 and 8.2 cms in 2011 and 2012.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Controle0
Outcome
Fruit Lengthe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
6.2 and 8.2 cmse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest values for the above parameters were recorded in Control (6.2 and 8.2 cms for Fruit Length, 2.5 and 2.7 cms for Fruit Diameter and 5.9 and 8.0 for Number of fruits per vineduring the years 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var Beit Alpha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control cucumbers had the lowest fruit diameter, 2.5 and 2.7 cms in 2011 and 2012.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Controle0
Outcome
Fruit Diametere0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.5 and 2.7 cmse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest values for the above parameters were recorded in Control (6.2 and 8.2 cms for Fruit Length, 2.5 and 2.7 cms for Fruit Diameter and 5.9 and 8.0 for Number of fruits per vineduring the years 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var Beit Alpha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control cucumbers had the lowest fruit number, 5.9 and 8.0 in 2011 and 2012.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Controle0
Outcome
Number of fruits per vinee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
5.9 and 8.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest values for the above parameters were recorded in Control (6.2 and 8.2 cms for Fruit Length, 2.5 and 2.7 cms for Fruit Diameter and 5.9 and 8.0 for Number of fruits per vineduring the years 2011 and 2012 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var Beit Alpha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–108 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 65 positive, 8 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.