Abstract
Wheat stripe rust is one of the most destructive diseases to affect wheat. Although the major resistant wheat varieties have made a great contribution to global food security, yield losses from stripe rust still occur in large wheat growing areas when climatic conditions are unstable. Despite this threat, resistance levels and yield losses of these elite wheat cultivars under wheat stripe rust infection have not been well studied. Based on this investigation of natural infection conditions over 2 years, analysis of the area-under-the-disease-progress-curves differentiated the susceptible cultivars Mianmai 367 (MM367; 788.59), Jinmai 47 (JM47; 1,087.71), and Avocet Susceptible (AvS; 1,314.59) from resistant cultivars Xikemai 18 (XKM18; 177.50) and Xiaoyan 6 (XY6; 545.67). Stripe rust resulted in a 2-year mean yield loss of 32% for all tested varieties. The susceptible varieties JM47, AvS, and MM367 lost 64, 55, and 21% of grain yield, respectively. On the contrary, rust-resistant cultivars XKM18 and XY6 lost only 11 and 28%, respectively. In addition, stripe rust resulted in reduced kernel hardness, flour yield, and flour whiteness. Dough and gluten properties were also affected. Overall, results revealed that the grain yield and quality loss values of the resistant wheat cultivars were less than in the susceptible cultivars. Disease-resistant cultivars such as XKM18 should be promoted and recommended for application. It may also be suggested that growing a susceptible variety such as MM367 could be feasible in combination with fungicide application under high disease pressure.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Disease progress distinguished susceptible cultivars from resistant cultivars.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- area-under-the-disease-progress-curvese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“area-under-the-disease-progress-curves differentiated the susceptible cultivars Mianmai 367 (MM367; 788.59), Jinmai 47 (JM47; 1,087.71), and Avocet Susceptible (AvS; 1,314.59) from resistant cultivars Xikemai 18 (XKM18; 177.50) and Xiaoyan 6 (XY6; 545.67)”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Stripe rust caused a mean grain yield loss of 32% across varieties.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Interactor
- Stripe ruste0pathogen
- Outcome
- yield losse0
- Value
- 32%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Stripe rust resulted in a 2-year mean yield loss of 32% for all tested varieties”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
JM47 lost 64% grain yield to stripe rust.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The susceptible varieties JM47, AvS, and MM367 lost 64, 55, and 21% of grain yield, respectively”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
AvS lost 55% grain yield to stripe rust.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The susceptible varieties JM47, AvS, and MM367 lost 64, 55, and 21% of grain yield, respectively”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
MM367 lost 21% grain yield to stripe rust.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The susceptible varieties JM47, AvS, and MM367 lost 64, 55, and 21% of grain yield, respectively”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
XKM18 lost 11% grain yield to stripe rust.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rust-resistant cultivars XKM18 and XY6 lost only 11 and 28%, respectively”
e1“lost 64, 55, and 21% of grain yield”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
XY6 lost 28% grain yield to stripe rust.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rust-resistant cultivars XKM18 and XY6 lost only 11 and 28%, respectively”
e1“lost 64, 55, and 21% of grain yield”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Stripe rust reduced kernel hardness, flour yield and flour whiteness.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Interactor
- stripe ruste0pathogen
- Outcome
- kernel hardness, flour yield, and flour whitenesse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“stripe rust resulted in reduced kernel hardness, flour yield, and flour whiteness”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Resistant cultivars had less grain yield and quality loss than susceptible cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- grain yield and quality loss valuese0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Comparator
- susceptible cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the grain yield and quality loss values of the resistant wheat cultivars were less than in the susceptible cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend promoting disease-resistant cultivars such as XKM18.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- XKM18e0
- Outcome
- should be promoted and recommended for applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Disease-resistant cultivars such as XKM18 should be promoted and recommended for application”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest MM367 could be grown with fungicide under high disease pressure.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- MM367e0
- Outcome
- could be feasible in combination with fungicide applicatione0
- Qualifier
- under high disease pressuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growing a susceptible variety such as MM367 could be feasible in combination with fungicide application under high disease pressure”
t0“Wheat”