Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

The Optimal Cultivar × Sowing Date × Plant Density for Grain Yield and Resource Use Efficiency of Summer Maize in the Northern Huang–Huai–Hai Plain of China

Lichao Zhai; Lihua Zhang; Haipo Yao; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to explore the optimal cultivar × sowing date × plant density for summer maize (Zea mays L.) in the Northern Huang–Huai–Hai (HHH) Plain of China, field experiments were conducted over two consecutive years (2018–2019) on a loam soil in the Northern HHH Plain. A split–split plot design was employed in this study, and the main plots included three cultivars (HM1: early-maturing cultivar; ZD958: medium-maturing cultivar; DH605: late-maturing cultivar); subplots consisted of three sowing dates (SD1: June 10; SD2: June 17; SD3: June 24); sub-sub plots include two plant densities (PD1: 6.75 × 104 plants ha−1; PD2: 8.25 × 104 plants ha−1). The results showed that the effects of cultivar and plant density on grain yield of summer maize were not significant, and the sowing date was the major factor affecting the grain yield. Delayed sowing significantly decreased the grain yield of summer maize, this was due mainly to the reduced kernel weight, which is associated with the lower post-anthesis dry matter accumulation. Moreover, radiation use efficiency (RUE), temperature use efficiency (TUE), and water use efficiency (WUE) were significantly affected by cultivar, sowing date, and plant density. Selecting early- and medium-maturing cultivars was beneficial to the improvements in RUE and TUE, and plants grown at earlier sowing with higher plant density increased the RUE and TUE. The interactive analysis of cultivar × sowing date × plant density showed that the optimum grain yields of all tested cultivars were observed at SD1-PD2, and the optimum RUE and TUE for HM1, ZD958, and DH605 were observed at SD1-PD2, SD2-PD2, and SD2-PD2, respectively. The differences in the optimum grain yield, RUE, and TUE among the tested cultivars were not significant. These results suggested that plants grown at earlier sowing with reasonable dense planting had benefits of grain yield and resource use efficiency. In order to adapt to mechanized grain harvesting, early-maturing cultivar with lower grain moisture at harvest would be the better choice. Therefore, adopting early-maturing cultivars grown with earlier sowing with reasonably higher plant density would be the optimal planting pattern for summer maize production in the Northern HHH Plain of China in future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar effects on maize grain yield were not significant.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material
cultivare0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of cultivar and plant density on grain yield of summer maize were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density effects on maize grain yield were not significant.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of cultivar and plant density on grain yield of summer maize were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing significantly decreased maize grain yield.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Delayed sowinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing significantly decreased the grain yield of summer maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced kernel weight was the main explanation given for reduced yield under delayed sowing.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
reduced kernel weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed sowing significantly decreased the grain yield of summer maize, this was due mainly to the reduced kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced kernel weight was associated with lower post-anthesis dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
post-anthesise0
Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
lower post-anthesis dry matter accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced kernel weight, which is associated with the lower post-anthesis dry matter accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar, sowing date and density significantly affected RUE, TUE and WUE.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material
cultivare0
Treatment
sowing date, and plant densitye0
Outcome
radiation use efficiency (RUE), temperature use efficiency (TUE), and water use efficiency (WUE)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radiation use efficiency (RUE), temperature use efficiency (TUE), and water use efficiency (WUE) were significantly affected by cultivar, sowing date, and plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-maturing cultivars improved RUE and TUE.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material
early-e0
Outcome
RUE and TUEe0
Direction
improvementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selecting early- and medium-maturing cultivars was beneficial to the improvements in RUE and TUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium-maturing cultivars improved RUE and TUE.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material
medium-maturing cultivarse0
Outcome
RUE and TUEe0
Direction
improvementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selecting early- and medium-maturing cultivars was beneficial to the improvements in RUE and TUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier sowing increased RUE and TUE.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
earlier sowinge0
Outcome
RUE and TUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown at earlier sowing with higher plant density increased the RUE and TUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher plant density increased RUE and TUE.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
higher plant densitye0
Outcome
RUE and TUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown at earlier sowing with higher plant density increased the RUE and TUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All cultivars had optimal grain yield at SD1-PD2.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SD1-PD2e0
Outcome
optimum grain yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum grain yields of all tested cultivars were observed at SD1-PD2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HM1 had optimal RUE and TUE at SD1-PD2.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material
HM1e0
Treatment
SD1-PD2e0
Outcome
optimum RUE and TUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum RUE and TUE for HM1, ZD958, and DH605 were observed at SD1-PD2, SD2-PD2, and SD2-PD2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZD958 had optimal RUE and TUE at SD2-PD2.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material
ZD958e0
Treatment
SD2-PD2e0
Outcome
optimum RUE and TUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum RUE and TUE for HM1, ZD958, and DH605 were observed at SD1-PD2, SD2-PD2, and SD2-PD2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DH605 had optimal RUE and TUE at SD2-PD2.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material
DH605e0
Treatment
SD2-PD2e0
Outcome
optimum RUE and TUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum RUE and TUE for HM1, ZD958, and DH605 were observed at SD1-PD2, SD2-PD2, and SD2-PD2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum grain yield, RUE and TUE did not differ significantly among cultivars.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Material
tested cultivarse0
Outcome
optimum grain yield, RUE, and TUEe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences in the optimum grain yield, RUE, and TUE among the tested cultivars were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1774 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor an early-maturing cultivar with lower harvest grain moisture for mechanized harvest.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
early-maturing cultivar with lower grain moisture at harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early-maturing cultivar with lower grain moisture at harvest would be the better choice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend early-maturing cultivars with earlier sowing and reasonably higher density.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
optimal planting patterne0
Setting
Northern HHH Plain of Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adopting early-maturing cultivars grown with earlier sowing with reasonably higher plant density would be the optimal planting pattern for summer maize production in the Northern HHH Plain of China in future.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

197 papers: 119 positive, 78 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

193 papers more in this group

See all 197 papers →

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 178 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

265 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.