Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Factors Affecting Adult Captures of the Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pheromone-Baited Traps

Alkiviadis Karakasis; Evagelia Lampiri; Christos I. Rumbos; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of funnel-trap color, trap height and pheromone formulation on the adult captures of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were evaluated in traps that were suspended in cotton fields in central Greece. Briefly, in a first trial, the efficacy of funnel traps of three different colors, i.e., green, striped (with black and white stripes) and white, was comparatively evaluated, whereas in a second trial green funnel traps were placed at three heights, i.e., 30, 60 and 90 cm from the ground. Finally, in a third trial we tested the efficiency of green funnel traps with three commercially available pheromone lures. Considering the overall captures, trap color and pheromone formulation affected male captures, whereas trap height had no influence. Captures notably increased in all traps from late August to mid-September. In total, the white funnel trap captured more moths than the green or striped funnel traps. Placement of the traps at different heights did not significantly affect captures, but seasonal differences were observed at individual dates during the trapping period. Barrettine’s pheromone lure provided significantly more captures than the other two (Russell, Trécé) in some of the trap-check dates. The results can be further utilized in the monitoring protocols of H. armigera in cotton fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap color affected male captures.

Treatment
trap colore0
Outcome
male capturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trap color and pheromone formulation affected male captures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone formulation affected male captures.

Treatment
pheromone formulatione0
Outcome
male capturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trap color and pheromone formulation affected male captures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap height did not influence captures overall.

Outcome
trap height had no influencee0
Direction
no influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trap height had no influence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captures increased from late August to mid-September.

Outcome
Capturese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
late August to mid-Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Captures notably increased in all traps from late August to mid-September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White traps captured more moths than green or striped traps.

Treatment
white funnel trape0
Outcome
mothse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
green or striped funnel trapse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the white funnel trap captured more moths than the green or striped funnel traps.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap heights did not significantly affect captures.

Treatment
different heightse0
Outcome
capturese0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placement of the traps at different heights did not significantly affect captures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captures varied seasonally at individual dates.

Outcome
seasonal differencese0
Qualifier
individual datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seasonal differences were observed at individual dates during the trapping period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Barrettine lure captured significantly more moths than Russell and Trécé on some dates.

Treatment
Barrettine’s pheromone luree0
Outcome
capturese0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
some of the trap-check datese0
Comparator
Russell, Trécée0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barrettine’s pheromone lure provided significantly more captures than the other two (Russell, Trécé) in some of the trap-check dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑