Paper · 2021 · Revista em Agronegócio e Meio Ambiente

Comparison of methodologies for determining the carbon content in wood

Thiago Cardoso Silva; Emmanoella Costa Guaraná Araujo; Carlos Roberto Sanquetta; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

New procedures seek to subsidize studies on biomass and carbon in forests and wood, mainly of tropical species. Thus, the work aimed to compare four methods of carbon determination in wood. A pre-dried sample of tropical wood was prepared and previously ground. In this sample, the carbon content was determined, applying four different methodologies, namely: conversion of organic matter, volumetric method, colorimetric method and dry combustion (LECO). The Tukey test was performed to determine the difference between the carbon levels obtained by each method. As a result, all methods differed statistically from each other: the colorimetric method underestimated the levels of organic carbon in a tropical wood; although widely used, the volumetric method has become obsolete; and the organic matter conversion method requires specific conversion factors for each material. So, from the environmental point of view and accuracy in obtaining data, the dry combustion method, in addition to being the closest to the standard, is also the one that generates less waste, being the most suitable to determinate carbon in wood.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The four methods yielded statistically different carbon levels.

Outcome
carbon levelse2
Comparator
each othere0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“As a result, all methods differed statistically from each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–627 · show in text ↑
e1

“conversion of organic matter, volumetric method, colorimetric method and dry combustion (LECO)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–454 · show in text ↑
e2

“carbon levels obtained by each method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–562 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The colorimetric method underestimated organic carbon in tropical wood.

Outcome
levels of organic carbone0
Direction
underestimatede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the colorimetric method underestimated the levels of organic carbon in a tropical wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–715 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors describe the volumetric method as obsolete.

Outcome
the volumetric method has become obsoletee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“although widely used, the volumetric method has become obsolete”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–780 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Organic matter conversion requires material-specific conversion factors.

Outcome
specific conversion factors for each materiale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the organic matter conversion method requires specific conversion factors for each material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–877 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry combustion is closest to the standard and generates less waste.

Outcome
closest to the standarde0
Comparator
standarde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the dry combustion method, in addition to being the closest to the standard, is also the one that generates less waste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1070 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend dry combustion as most suitable for carbon determination in wood.

Treatment
dry combustion methode0
Outcome
most suitable to determinate carbon in woode0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the dry combustion method, in addition to being the closest to the standard, is also the one that generates less waste, being the most suitable to determinate carbon in wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1125 · show in text ↑