Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Response of Rice Harvest Index to Different Water and Nitrogen Management Modes in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China

Sicheng Du; Zhongxue Zhang; Tiecheng Li; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Understanding the methods leading to rice yield increase is vital for sustainable agricultural development. Improving the harvest index (HI) is an important way to increase rice yield. To explore the effects of different water and nitrogen management modes on the rice HI in the black soil region of Northeast China, a field experiment was conducted in 2019 (Y1) and 2020 (Y2). Two irrigation methods, conventional flooding irrigation (FI) and controlled irrigation (CI), were established in the experiment, and four nitrogen application levels (0 kg/ha, 85 kg/ha, 110 kg/ha, and 135 kg/ha) were set during the entire growth period, named N0, N1, N2, and N3. The dry matter weight and the rice yield at the maturity stage were determined, and the HI was then calculated. The results showed that different irrigation modes and nitrogen application levels had significant effects on the rice HI. Under different irrigation modes with the same nitrogen application level during the two years, the comparison regular of HI was consistent. In Y1 and Y2, the HI of FN0 was 3.36% and 5.02% higher than that of CN0 (p < 0.05), and the HI of CN1 was 0.31% and 2.43% higher than that of FN1 (p > 0.05). The HI under CI was significantly higher than that under FI under N2 and N3 (p < 0.05), the HI of CN2 was 4.21% and 4.97% higher than that of FN2, and the HI of FN3 was 13.12% and 20.34% higher than that of CN3. In addition, during the two-year experiment, the HI first increased and then decreased with an increase in the nitrogen application rate under FI and CI. Under the FI treatments, the HI of N1 was the highest, and that of N2 was the highest under the CI treatments. A variance analysis showed that the irrigation pattern and nitrogen application level had significant interactions on the rice HI (p < 0.01), and the appropriate water and N management mode could increase rice the HI by 26.89%. The experimental results showed that the HI of the 110 kg/ha nitrogen application rate under CI was the highest, reaching 0.574 and 0.572, respectively, in two years. This study provides a data reference and theoretical support for realizing water savings, nitrogen reduction, and sustainable agricultural development in the black soil region of Northeast China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nitrogen levels significantly affected rice harvest index.

Treatment
different irrigation modes and nitrogen application levelse0
Outcome
rice HIe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different irrigation modes and nitrogen application levels had significant effects on the rice HI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FN0 harvest index exceeded CN0 by 3.36% in Y1 and 5.02% in Y2.

Treatment
FN0e0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.36% and 5.02%e0
Comparator
CN0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Y1 and Y2, the HI of FN0 was 3.36% and 5.02% higher than that of CN0 (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CN1 harvest index exceeded FN1 by 0.31% and 2.43%, without statistical significance.

Treatment
CN1e0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.31% and 2.43%e0
Comparator
FN1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the HI of CN1 was 0.31% and 2.43% higher than that of FN1 (p > 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CN2 harvest index exceeded FN2 by 4.21% and 4.97%.

Treatment
CN2e0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.21% and 4.97%e0
Comparator
FN2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the HI of CN2 was 4.21% and 4.97% higher than that of FN2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FN3 harvest index exceeded CN3 by 13.12% and 20.34%.

Treatment
FN3e0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.12% and 20.34%e0
Comparator
CN3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the HI of FN3 was 13.12% and 20.34% higher than that of CN3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index first rose and then fell as nitrogen application increased.

Treatment
nitrogen application ratee0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
first increased and then decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the HI first increased and then decreased with an increase in the nitrogen application rate under FI and CI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N1 had the highest harvest index under FI.

Treatment
N1e0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
FI treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the FI treatments, the HI of N1 was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 had the highest harvest index under CI.

Treatment
N2e0
Outcome
higheste0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
CI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that of N2 was the highest under the CI treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation pattern and nitrogen level significantly interacted in their effect on rice harvest index.

Treatment
irrigation pattern and nitrogen application levele0
Outcome
rice HIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the irrigation pattern and nitrogen application level had significant interactions on the rice HI (p < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriate water and nitrogen management increased harvest index by 26.89%.

Treatment
appropriate water and N management modee0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26.89%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“appropriate water and N management mode could increase rice the HI by 26.89%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled irrigation with 110 kg/ha nitrogen produced the highest harvest index, 0.574 and 0.572 in the two years.

Treatment
110 kg/ha nitrogen application rate under CIe0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.574 and 0.572e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the HI of the 110 kg/ha nitrogen application rate under CI was the highest, reaching 0.574 and 0.572, respectively, in two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–2063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.