Paper · 2020 · АГРАРНЫЙ ВЕСТНИК ВЕРХНЕВОЛЖЬЯ

INFLUENCE OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS ON WEEDING AND YIELD OF FORAGE CROPS IN THE CONDITIONS OF TILLAGE MINIMIZATION

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Intensive development of livestock industry requires improving its feed base. Unconventional fodder crops can help agricultural producers get high yields of good quality. The aim of the research was to study the elements of cultivating soy, amaranth and buckwheat in conditions of minimizing tillage when using biological products Baikal Em-1 and Humate potassium. The work was carried out on sod-podzolic medium loamy gleyous soil in the experimental field of the Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education Yaroslavl State Agricultural Academy in 2019. The studied indicators were determined by generally accepted methods. When cultivating spring cereals, a significant decrease in the dry weight of weeds was noted by 3.15-7.67 g / m2. On average, according to some factors, the use of a surface tillage system caused a statistically significant increase in the number of young weeds by 1.3 pcs / m2. In the same treatment variant, an increase in the dry mass of young weeds by 3.34 g / m2 and perennials by 4.07 g / m2 was observed. A significant decrease in the length of vegetative organs in the layer of 0-10 cm by 15.44 cm and dry mass in the lower part of the arable horizon by 1.37 g / m2 was noted in row crops. On average, for primary tillage systems and biological products, buckwheat cultivation contributes to a significant increase in green mass productivity by 31.7 kg / ha. A significant increase in the yield of feed units was observed when cultivating amaranth and buckwheat by 9.9 and 14.9 kg / ha. On average, according to some factors, the use of the surface treatment system led to a statistically significant decrease in yield of both green mass andfeed units by 9.1 and 2.5 kg / ha, respectively. The greatest efficiency was shown by growing buckwheat for fodder purposes in the case of a heap processing system using Baikal Em-1 biological product.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring cereal cultivation reduced weed dry weight by 3.15-7.67 g per square metre.

Taxon
spring cerealse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
3.15-7.67 g / m2e0

Verbatim

e0

“When cultivating spring cereals, a significant decrease in the dry weight of weeds was noted by 3.15-7.67 g / m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface tillage increased young-weed count by 1.3 per square metre.

Treatment
surface tillage systeme0
Interactor
young weedse0weed
Outcome
number of young weedse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.3 pcs / m2e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the use of a surface tillage system caused a statistically significant increase in the number of young weeds by 1.3 pcs / m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface tillage increased young-weed dry mass by 3.34 g per square metre.

Interactor
young weedse0weed
Outcome
dry mass of young weedse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.34 g / m2e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the dry mass of young weeds by 3.34 g / m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface tillage increased perennial weed dry mass by 4.07 g per square metre.

Outcome
perennialse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
4.07 g / m2e0
Interactor role
weede0

Not reportedTaxonInteractorTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“and perennials by 4.07 g / m2 was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In row crops, vegetative-organ length in the topsoil fell by 15.44 cm.

Taxon
row cropse1
Outcome
length of vegetative organse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
15.44 cme0
Qualifier
layer of 0-10 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in the length of vegetative organs in the layer of 0-10 cm by 15.44 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1151 · show in text ↑
e1

“row crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1242 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In row crops, dry mass in the lower arable horizon fell by 1.37 g per square metre.

Taxon
row cropse1
Outcome
dry mass in the lower part of the arable horizone0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
1.37 g / m2e0

Verbatim

e0

“dry mass in the lower part of the arable horizon by 1.37 g / m2 was noted in row crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1243 · show in text ↑
e1

“row crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1242 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Buckwheat cultivation increased green-mass productivity by 31.7 kg per hectare.

Taxon
buckwheate0
Outcome
green mass productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31.7 kg / hae0

Verbatim

e0

“buckwheat cultivation contributes to a significant increase in green mass productivity by 31.7 kg / ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1412 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranth cultivation raised feed-unit yield by 9.9 kg per hectare.

Outcome
yield of feed unitse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase in the yield of feed units was observed when cultivating amaranth and buckwheat by 9.9 and 14.9 kg / ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Buckwheat cultivation raised feed-unit yield by 14.9 kg per hectare.

Taxon
buckwheate0
Outcome
yield of feed unitse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.9 kg / hae0

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase in the yield of feed units was observed when cultivating amaranth and buckwheat by 9.9 and 14.9 kg / ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface treatment reduced green-mass yield by 9.1 kg per hectare.

Treatment
surface treatment systeme0
Outcome
yield of both green masse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
9.1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the use of the surface treatment system led to a statistically significant decrease in yield of both green mass andfeed units by 9.1 and 2.5 kg / ha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1743 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface treatment reduced feed-unit yield by 2.5 kg per hectare.

Treatment
surface treatment systeme0
Outcome
feed unitse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
2.5 kg / hae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the use of the surface treatment system led to a statistically significant decrease in yield of both green mass andfeed units by 9.1 and 2.5 kg / ha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1743 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buckwheat grown for fodder with heap processing and Baikal Em-1 showed greatest efficiency.

Taxon
buckwheate0
Treatment
heap processing system using Baikal Em-1 biological producte0
Outcome
greatest efficiencye0
Direction
greateste0

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest efficiency was shown by growing buckwheat for fodder purposes in the case of a heap processing system using Baikal Em-1 biological product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1896 · show in text ↑