Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Managing essential plant nutrients to improve maize productivity in the savanna agroecological zones of Northern Ghana: the role of secondary and micronutrients

Sampson Agyin-Birikorang; Ignatius Tindjina; Raphael Adu-Gyamfi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies have shown that despite the positive response of maize to nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), actual yields in the savanna agroecological zones (AEZs) of northern Ghana remain well below the potential even with N-P-K fertilizer application. In a two-year nutrient omission trial in 12 locations within the Sudan savanna and Guinea savanna AEZs of northern Ghana, we quantified maize yield increases resulting from addition of secondary and micronutrients from the NPK-only fertilization practice for maize production in the two AEZs. In both years, applying only NPK fertilizer resulted in average yields of 3.6 t ha − 1 and 2.5 t ha − 1 in the Guinea savanna and Sudan savanna AEZs, respectively. However, addition of sulfur (S), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) to the NPK fertilizers (“balanced” fertilization) resulted in an average of 60% and 64% yield increases over those of the NPK-only treatment in the Sudan savanna and Guinea savanna AEZs, respectively. Compared to balanced fertilization, omission of S, Zn, and B reduced grain yield by an average of ∼34%, ∼28%, and ∼14%, respectively. The combined data suggest that, even though secondary- and micronutrients are needed in small quantities by plants relative to N, P, and K, they have an enormous effect on crop productivity. Therefore, to ensure sustainably increased maize productivity in the savanna agroecological zones of northern Ghana, fertilizer recommendations should not be restricted to only NPK fertilizers but all limiting secondary- and micronutrients must be accounted for in a holistic and balanced fertilizer recommendation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK-only maize fertilization yielded an average 3.6 t ha − 1 in Guinea savanna.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
applying only NPK fertilizere0
Outcome
average yieldse0
Value
3.6 t ha − 1e0
Setting
Guinea savannae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying only NPK fertilizer resulted in average yields of 3.6 t ha − 1 and 2.5 t ha − 1 in the Guinea savanna and Sudan savanna AEZs, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK-only maize fertilization yielded an average 2.5 t ha − 1 in Sudan savanna.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
applying only NPK fertilizere0
Outcome
average yieldse0
Value
2.5 t ha − 1e0
Setting
Sudan savannae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying only NPK fertilizer resulted in average yields of 3.6 t ha − 1 and 2.5 t ha − 1 in the Guinea savanna and Sudan savanna AEZs, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding S, Zn and B to NPK increased maize yield 60% over NPK only in Sudan savanna.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
addition of sulfur (S), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) to the NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
NPK-only treatmente0
Setting
Sudan savannae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of sulfur (S), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) to the NPK fertilizers (“balanced” fertilization) resulted in an average of 60% and 64% yield increases over those of the NPK-only treatment in the Sudan savanna and Guinea savanna AEZs, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding S, Zn and B to NPK increased maize yield 64% over NPK only in Guinea savanna.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
addition of sulfur (S), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) to the NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
64%e0
Comparator
NPK-only treatmente0
Setting
Guinea savannae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of sulfur (S), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) to the NPK fertilizers (“balanced” fertilization) resulted in an average of 60% and 64% yield increases over those of the NPK-only treatment in the Sudan savanna and Guinea savanna AEZs, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting S from balanced fertilization reduced maize grain yield by about 34%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
omission of Se0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
∼34%e0
Comparator
balanced fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to balanced fertilization, omission of S, Zn, and B reduced grain yield by an average of ∼34%, ∼28%, and ∼14%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting Zn from balanced fertilization reduced maize grain yield by about 28%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
omission of S, Zn, and Be0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
∼28%e0
Comparator
balanced fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to balanced fertilization, omission of S, Zn, and B reduced grain yield by an average of ∼34%, ∼28%, and ∼14%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting B from balanced fertilization reduced maize grain yield by about 14%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
omission of S, Zn, and Be0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
∼14%e0
Comparator
balanced fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to balanced fertilization, omission of S, Zn, and B reduced grain yield by an average of ∼34%, ∼28%, and ∼14%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend accounting for all limiting secondary and micronutrients in maize fertilizer recommendations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
all limiting secondary- and micronutrients must be accounted for in a holistic and balanced fertilizer recommendatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer recommendations should not be restricted to only NPK fertilizers but all limiting secondary- and micronutrients must be accounted for in a holistic and balanced fertilizer recommendation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

83 papers: 72 positive, 11 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

polysulfur · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.