Paper · 2014 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA

A. Abdalla; S. Elayan; N. Abdel-Gawad; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Egyptian cotton growers are facing an unavoidable problem of late planting of cotton. To address such problem, four barbadense genotypes; two long staple [cultivar G86 and promising line of the cross (10229 x Giza 86)] and two extra long staple [cultivar G88 and promising line of the cross (Giza 84x G70xG51BxPima62)] were grown in three planting dates (April 15, April 30 and May15) at Nile Delta cotton zone, Egypt, during two successive seasons 2012 and 2013. Research objectives were to determine planting date effects on the performance of selected genotypes, data variability, and relation with air thermal units. The results showed that the PDs and genotypes had less effect on the data normality in both seasons with few exceptions. Slightly negative to positive skewness and kurtosis were observed. Moderate to high variability (CV %) was observed in yield determinants; while moderate to low variability existed in fiber and yarn determinants. Planting date (PD) and genotype (G) influenced significantly (P<0.01) yield, fiber and yarn variables. However, the PD x G interaction was not significant for most lint and yarn traits. With the exception of plant height and yarn evenness, mean performance of yield and fiber determinants of genotypes declined by delaying planting date. The delayed planting from 30 April to 15 May had more adverse effect on most traits than the delayed planting from 15 to 30 April. For example, seed cotton yield per plant lost 6.38 and 9.15 gm in the first season compared with 8.14 and 8.47 gm in the second season due to the first and second 15-day delay of planting, respectively. Except for yarn traits, response curves showed linearly negative effects of delaying planting on cotton yield and fiber traits in the two seasons. The two promising crosses were significantly better than their corresponding cultivars especially in yield and its attributes. Averaged over the two seasons, heat units efficiency use (HUE) measured as a number of open bolls/plant corresponded to each accumulated heat unit (AHU) were 106.14, 129.15 and 164.41 hu/boll for the first, second and third planting dates, respectively. Discussion on yield and its attributes, fiber and yarn properties pointed out that the two promising crosses possessed potential to tolerate conditions of late planting, suggesting their use to replace the present cultivars and utilize in breeding program aimed at developing barbadense genotypes to grow under late planting of agroclimatic conditions of the River Nile Delta.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying planting date declined the mean performance of yield and fiber determinants of barbadense genotypes, except plant height and yarn evenness.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Treatment
delaying planting datee6
Outcome
mean performance of yield and fiber determinants of genotypese6
Direction
declinede6
Qualifier
With the exception of plant height and yarn evennesse6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e6

“With the exception of plant height and yarn evenness, mean performance of yield and fiber determinants of genotypes declined by delaying planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying planting from 30 April to 15 May had a more adverse effect on most traits than delaying planting from 15 to 30 April.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Treatment
delayed planting from 30 April to 15 Maye7
Outcome
most traitse7
Direction
more adversee7
Comparator
delayed planting from 15 to 30 Aprile7

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e7

“The delayed planting from 30 April to 15 May had more adverse effect on most traits than the delayed planting from 15 to 30 April”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first and second 15-day planting delays reduced seed cotton yield per plant by 6.38 and 9.15 gm in the first season.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Treatment
first and second 15-day delay of plantinge0
Outcome
seed cotton yield per plante0
Direction
loste0
Value
6.38 and 9.15 gme0
Setting
first seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“For example, seed cotton yield per plant lost 6.38 and 9.15 gm in the first season compared with 8.14 and 8.47 gm in the second season due to the first and second 15-day delay of planting, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first and second 15-day planting delays reduced seed cotton yield per plant by 8.14 and 8.47 gm in the second season.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Treatment
first and second 15-day delay of plantinge0
Outcome
seed cotton yield per plante0
Direction
loste0
Value
8.14 and 8.47 gme0
Setting
second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“For example, seed cotton yield per plant lost 6.38 and 9.15 gm in the first season compared with 8.14 and 8.47 gm in the second season due to the first and second 15-day delay of planting, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying planting had linearly negative effects on cotton yield and fiber traits in both seasons, except yarn traits.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Treatment
delaying plantinge0
Outcome
cotton yield and fiber traitse0
Direction
linearly negative effectse0
Qualifier
Except for yarn traitse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Except for yarn traits, response curves showed linearly negative effects of delaying planting on cotton yield and fiber traits in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date and genotype influenced yield, fiber and yarn variables significantly (P<0.01).

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Treatment
Planting date (PD) and genotype (G)e4
Outcome
yield, fiber and yarn variablese4
Qualifier
P<0.01e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Planting date (PD) and genotype (G) influenced significantly (P<0.01) yield, fiber and yarn variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1056 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The planting date x genotype interaction was not significant for most lint and yarn traits.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Treatment
PD x G interactione5
Outcome
lint and yarn traitse5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, the PD x G interaction was not significant for most lint and yarn traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield determinants of barbadense cotton showed moderate to high variability (CV %).

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Outcome
variability (CV %)e3
Value
Moderate to highe3
Qualifier
in yield determinantse3

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“Moderate to high variability (CV %) was observed in yield determinants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–879 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber and yarn determinants of barbadense cotton showed moderate to low variability (CV %).

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Outcome
variabilitye3
Value
moderate to lowe3
Qualifier
in fiber and yarn determinantse3

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“while moderate to low variability existed in fiber and yarn determinants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–953 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date and genotype had less effect on data normality, with few exceptions.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Outcome
data normalitye1
Qualifier
with few exceptionse1

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the PDs and genotypes had less effect on the data normality in both seasons with few exceptions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–740 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skewness and kurtosis were slightly negative to positive.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Outcome
skewness and kurtosise2
Value
Slightly negative to positivee2

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“Slightly negative to positive skewness and kurtosis were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–807 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two promising crosses were significantly better than their corresponding cultivars, especially in yield and its attributes.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Material
promising crossese0
Outcome
yield and its attributese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
their corresponding cultivarse0

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The two promising crosses were significantly better than their corresponding cultivars especially in yield and its attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat units efficiency use (HUE) was 106.14 hu/boll for the first planting date, averaged over two seasons.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Outcome
heat units efficiency use (HUE)e0
Value
106.14e0
Qualifier
Averaged over the two seasonse0

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Averaged over the two seasons, heat units efficiency use (HUE) measured as a number of open bolls/plant corresponded to each accumulated heat unit (AHU) were 106.14, 129.15 and 164.41 hu/boll for the first, second and third planting dates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat units efficiency use (HUE) was 129.15 hu/boll for the second planting date, averaged over two seasons.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Outcome
heat units efficiency use (HUE)e0
Value
129.15e0
Qualifier
Averaged over the two seasonse0

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Averaged over the two seasons, heat units efficiency use (HUE) measured as a number of open bolls/plant corresponded to each accumulated heat unit (AHU) were 106.14, 129.15 and 164.41 hu/boll for the first, second and third planting dates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat units efficiency use (HUE) was 164.41 hu/boll for the third planting date, averaged over two seasons.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Outcome
heat units efficiency use (HUE)e0
Value
164.41e0
Qualifier
Averaged over the two seasonse0

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Averaged over the two seasons, heat units efficiency use (HUE) measured as a number of open bolls/plant corresponded to each accumulated heat unit (AHU) were 106.14, 129.15 and 164.41 hu/boll for the first, second and third planting dates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2153 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two promising crosses possess potential to tolerate conditions of late planting.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Material
the two promising crossese0
Outcome
potential to tolerate conditions of late plantinge0

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“the two promising crosses possessed potential to tolerate conditions of late planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2238–2323 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The two promising crosses should be used to replace the present cultivars and in breeding for late planting.

Taxon
barbadense cottonst0
Outcome
their use to replace the present cultivarse0

Verbatim

t0

“ATTAINING ONE MONTH -LATE- PLANTING OF BARBADENSE COTTONS GROWN IN THE RIVER NILE DELTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“suggesting their use to replace the present cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2325–2378 · show in text ↑