Paper · 2017 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

PERFORMANCE OF TWO SUGARCANE VARIETIES AS AFFECTED BY IRRIGATION INTERVAL AND SEED RATE

M. Bekheet; R. Abd El-Aziz; M. El-Zeny

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study was conducted at Shandaweel Agricultural Research Station (26.5013 N, 31.7651 E), Sohag Governorate , Egypt in 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 seasons to deternine optimize irrigation interval and seed rate of sugarcane production. The current study included eighteen treatments representing the combinations among two sugarcane varieties (Giza-Taiwan 54-9 and G. 2003-47), three irrigation intervals (10, 15 and 20 days) and three seed rates of (25200, 37800 and 50400 buds/fed) resulted from one, one and half and two rows of seed setts . /furrow which contain three buds for each, respectively. The treatments were allocated in a Randomized Complete Block Design using a split-split plot arrangement with three replications. The results showed that decreasing irrigation intervals from 20 to 15 days significantly increased stalk length, stalk diameter, number of millable canes/fed, cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons. However, brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages were negatively and significantly affected by increasing the period between irrigations. Varieties differed significantly in their response to all the studied characters. The commercial variety G.T.54-9 recorded higher values of stalk length, stalk diameter and cane yield/fed, while the promising variety G. 2003-47 had higher number of millable canes/fed, brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages as well as sugar yield, in both seasons. Planting sugarcane using two rows of seed setts/furrow attained significant increases in stalk length and the number of millable canes/fed, in both seasons, while thickest stalks were obtained by 1.0 drill of cane cuttings. The higher brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages, cane and sugar yields were obtained by 1.5 drills of cane cuttings in both seasons. Under conditions of the present investigation, planting any of the evaluated cane varieties using 1.5 and/or 2.0 drills of cane setts and irrigating them at 10 and/or 15-day intervals can be recommended to get the maximum cane yield/fed. However, planting sugarcane variety G. 2003-47 using 1.5 drills of cane cuttings and irrigating it every 15 days can be recommended to obtain the highest sugar yield/fed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing irrigation interval from 20 to 15 days significantly increased stalk length, stalk diameter and millable cane number.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
15 dayse0
Outcome
stalk length, stalk diameter, number of millable canes/fede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
20e0

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing irrigation intervals from 20 to 15 days significantly increased stalk length, stalk diameter, number of millable canes/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing irrigation interval from 20 to 15 days significantly increased cane and sugar yields.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
15 dayse0
Outcome
cane and sugar yields/fede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
20e0

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing irrigation intervals from 20 to 15 days significantly increased stalk length, stalk diameter, number of millable canes/fed, cane and sugar yields/fed in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation periods significantly lowered brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
increasing the period between irrigationse0
Outcome
brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentagese0
Direction
negativelye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages were negatively and significantly affected by increasing the period between irrigations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties differed significantly across all studied traits.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
response to all the studied characterse0
Direction
differede0

Verbatim

e0

“Varieties differed significantly in their response to all the studied characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G.T.54-9 had higher stalk length, diameter and cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
G.T.54-9e0
Outcome
stalk length, stalk diameter and cane yield/fede0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“The commercial variety G.T.54-9 recorded higher values of stalk length, stalk diameter and cane yield/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. 2003-47 had more millable canes and higher brix and sucrose percentages.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
G. 2003-47e0
Outcome
number of millable canes/fed, brix, sucrosee0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“G. 2003-47 had higher number of millable canes/fed, brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages as well as sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. 2003-47 had higher sugar recovery percentage and sugar yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
G. 2003-47e0
Outcome
sugar recovery percentages as well as sugar yielde0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“G. 2003-47 had higher number of millable canes/fed, brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages as well as sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two rows of seed setts per furrow increased stalk length and millable cane number.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
two rows of seed setts/furrowe0
Outcome
stalk length and the number of millable canes/fede0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Planting sugarcane using two rows of seed setts/furrow attained significant increases in stalk length and the number of millable canes/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One drill of cane cuttings produced the thickest stalks.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
1.0 drill of cane cuttingse0
Outcome
thickest stalkse0
Direction
thickeste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“thickest stalks were obtained by 1.0 drill of cane cuttings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One and a half drills of cane cuttings gave higher brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
1.5 drills of cane cuttingse0
Outcome
brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentagese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The higher brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages, cane and sugar yields were obtained by 1.5 drills of cane cuttings in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1802 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One and a half drills of cane cuttings gave higher cane and sugar yields.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
1.5 drills of cane cuttingse0
Outcome
cane and sugar yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The higher brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages, cane and sugar yields were obtained by 1.5 drills of cane cuttings in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1802 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 1.5 or 2 drills and irrigation every 10 or 15 days for maximum cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
1.5 and/or 2.0 drills of cane setts and irrigating them at 10 and/or 15-day intervalse0
Outcome
maximum cane yield/fede0

Verbatim

e0

“planting any of the evaluated cane varieties using 1.5 and/or 2.0 drills of cane setts and irrigating them at 10 and/or 15-day intervals can be recommended to get the maximum cane yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–2040 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend G. 2003-47 with 1.5 drills and 15-day irrigation for the highest sugar yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
G. 2003-47e0
Treatment
1.5 drills of cane cuttings and irrigating it every 15 dayse0
Outcome
highest sugar yield/fede0

Verbatim

e0

“planting sugarcane variety G. 2003-47 using 1.5 drills of cane cuttings and irrigating it every 15 days can be recommended to obtain the highest sugar yield/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2211 · show in text ↑

transplanting · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.