Paper · 2022 · Agronomy Journal

Footprints of corn nitrogen management on the following soybean crop

Adrian A. Correndo; Eric Adee; Luiz H. Moro Rosso; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Corn ( Zea mays L.)–soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is among the most typical crop rotations in the U.S. Corn Belt, and N is the most limiting nutrient for both crops. This study aims to assess the effects of N management for corn on the following soybean crop. Two corn–soybean rotation N fertilizer rate studies—a long‐term study (1983–2020, Case Study I) and a two‐season study (2019–2020, Case Study II)—were conducted in Kansas (United States). Case Study I focused on soybean seed yield as the response variable, whereas Case Study II included a detailed seasonal characterization of soil N, symbiotic N fixation (SNF), and plant N uptake for soybean considering N fertilizer rates on the previous corn crop. Apparent N budgets from corn (N fertilizer minus grain N removal) ranged from approximately −100 to approximately +50 kg N ha −1 , and soybean yields were slightly or not affected by corn N management. Case Study I showed that long‐term N budgets in corn crops did not affect the following soybean crop yields. In Case Study II, the previous corn N management produced negative or small N surplus that influenced neither soil residual N nor SNF, without compromising soybean productivity. Farmers applying close to economic optimum N rates on corn will likely not generate scenarios of N surplus to compromise SNF or soybean yields. Forthcoming research should further address how long‐term and large soil N mining or surplus in corn may enhance or inhibit N fixation for the next soybean crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent N budgets from corn ranged from approximately −100 to approximately +50 kg N ha−1.

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse1
Outcome
Apparent N budgets from corne2
Value
approximately −100 to approximately +50 kg N ha −1e2
Setting
Kansase7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–28 · show in text ↑
e2

“Apparent N budgets from corn (N fertilizer minus grain N removal) ranged from approximately −100 to approximately +50 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–854 · show in text ↑
e7

“were conducted in Kansas (United States)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yields were slightly or not affected by corn N management.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe0
Treatment
corn N managemente3
Outcome
soybean yieldse3
Direction
not affectede3
Qualifier
slightlye3
Setting
Kansase7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“[ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is among the most typical crop rotations in the U.S. Corn Belt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–125 · show in text ↑
e3

“soybean yields were slightly or not affected by corn N management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–926 · show in text ↑
e7

“were conducted in Kansas (United States)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term N budgets in corn did not affect the following soybean crop yields in Kansas.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe0
Treatment
N budgets in corn cropse4
Outcome
soybean crop yieldse4
Direction
did not affecte4
Setting
Kansase7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“[ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is among the most typical crop rotations in the U.S. Corn Belt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–125 · show in text ↑
e4

“Case Study I showed that long‐term N budgets in corn crops did not affect the following soybean crop yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1035 · show in text ↑
e7

“were conducted in Kansas (United States)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous corn N management influenced neither soil residual N nor symbiotic N fixation in soybean.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe0
Treatment
previous corn N managemente5
Outcome
soil residual N nor SNFe5
Direction
influenced neithere5
Setting
Kansase7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“[ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is among the most typical crop rotations in the U.S. Corn Belt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–125 · show in text ↑
e5

“the previous corn N management produced negative or small N surplus that influenced neither soil residual N nor SNF, without compromising soybean productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1213 · show in text ↑
e7

“were conducted in Kansas (United States)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous corn N management did not compromise soybean productivity.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe0
Treatment
previous corn N managemente5
Outcome
soybean productivitye5
Direction
without compromisinge5
Setting
Kansase7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“[ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is among the most typical crop rotations in the U.S. Corn Belt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–125 · show in text ↑
e5

“the previous corn N management produced negative or small N surplus that influenced neither soil residual N nor SNF, without compromising soybean productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1213 · show in text ↑
e7

“were conducted in Kansas (United States)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–459 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers applying close to economic optimum N rates on corn will likely not generate N surplus that compromises SNF or soybean yields.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe0
Treatment
close to economic optimum N rates on corne6
Outcome
scenarios of N surplus to compromise SNF or soybean yieldse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“[ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is among the most typical crop rotations in the U.S. Corn Belt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–125 · show in text ↑
e6

“Farmers applying close to economic optimum N rates on corn will likely not generate scenarios of N surplus to compromise SNF or soybean yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1357 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

70 papers: 48 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 59 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

416 papers: 318 positive, 98 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 318 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

412 papers more in this group

See all 416 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.