Paper · 2022 · Insects

Life Histories and Host-Range Evaluation of Two Chrysomelid Beetles (Zygogramma spp.) Released against Tithonia rotundifolia in South Africa

Khethani V. Mawela; David O. Simelane; Terence Olckers

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tithonia rotundifolia (Mill.) S.F. Blake (Asteraceae) is among the three Tithonia species from Mexico that are invasive in South Africa. To curb its invasiveness and negative impact in South Africa, two chrysomelid beetles, Zygogramma signatipennis (Stål) and Zygogramma piceicollis (Stål), from Mexico were investigated as candidate biological control agents. The life histories and host ranges of these beetles were studied under laboratory conditions to determine their suitability for release. The two beetle species displayed very similar life histories, including a short pre-oviposition period (13–14 days), incubation period (4–5 days) and lifecycle (40–45 days). The longevity of Z. signatipennis and Z. piceicollis was 113 and 125 days, while their fecundities were 1146 and 1133 eggs per female, respectively. Feeding, oviposition and development of both beetle species were confined within the tribe Heliantheae, but showed a very strong preference for the invasive T. rotundifolia. The only non-target species that supported development to adulthood was the exotic weed Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray, itself a target for biocontrol. Although some sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars were partially utilized during host-specificity tests, none supported complete development, suggesting that both Zygogramma species are suitable for release in South Africa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Zygogramma beetle species, studied for biocontrol of Tithonia rotundifolia, had a short pre-oviposition period of 13-14 days.

Taxon
Tithonia rotundifoliaTithonia rotundifoliae0
Interactor
Zygogramma signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Zygogramma piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pre-oviposition periode2
Value
13–14 dayse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia rotundifolia
Tithonia rotundifolia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · Second interactorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia rotundifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zygogramma signatipennis (Stål) and Zygogramma piceicollis (Stål)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-oviposition period (13–14 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–613 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Zygogramma beetle species had an incubation period of 4-5 days.

Taxon
Tithonia rotundifoliaTithonia rotundifoliae0
Interactor
Zygogramma signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Zygogramma piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incubation periode2
Value
4–5 dayse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia rotundifolia
Tithonia rotundifolia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · Second interactorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia rotundifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zygogramma signatipennis (Stål) and Zygogramma piceicollis (Stål)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“incubation period (4–5 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–643 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Zygogramma beetle species had a lifecycle of 40-45 days.

Taxon
Tithonia rotundifoliaTithonia rotundifoliae0
Interactor
Zygogramma signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Zygogramma piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
lifecyclee2
Value
40–45 dayse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia rotundifolia
Tithonia rotundifolia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · Second interactorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia rotundifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zygogramma signatipennis (Stål) and Zygogramma piceicollis (Stål)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“lifecycle (40–45 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–670 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longevity of Zygogramma signatipennis was 113 days.

Taxon
Tithonia rotundifoliaTithonia rotundifoliae0
Interactor
Z. signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
longevitye1
Value
113e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia rotundifolia
Tithonia rotundifolia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia rotundifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“The longevity of Z. signatipennis and Z. piceicollis was 113 and 125 days, while their fecundities were 1146 and 1133 eggs per female, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longevity of Zygogramma piceicollis was 125 days.

Taxon
Tithonia rotundifoliaTithonia rotundifoliae0
Interactor
Z. piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
longevitye1
Value
125 dayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia rotundifolia
Tithonia rotundifolia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · InteractorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia rotundifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“The longevity of Z. signatipennis and Z. piceicollis was 113 and 125 days, while their fecundities were 1146 and 1133 eggs per female, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fecundity of Zygogramma signatipennis was 1146 eggs per female.

Taxon
Tithonia rotundifoliaTithonia rotundifoliae0
Interactor
Z. signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fecunditiese1
Value
1146e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia rotundifolia
Tithonia rotundifolia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia rotundifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“The longevity of Z. signatipennis and Z. piceicollis was 113 and 125 days, while their fecundities were 1146 and 1133 eggs per female, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fecundity of Zygogramma piceicollis was 1133 eggs per female.

Taxon
Tithonia rotundifoliaTithonia rotundifoliae0
Interactor
Z. piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fecunditiese1
Value
1133 eggs per femalee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia rotundifolia
Tithonia rotundifolia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · InteractorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia rotundifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“The longevity of Z. signatipennis and Z. piceicollis was 113 and 125 days, while their fecundities were 1146 and 1133 eggs per female, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding, oviposition and development of both Zygogramma species were confined within the plant tribe Heliantheae.

Taxon
Tithonia rotundifoliaTithonia rotundifoliae0
Interactor
Zygogramma signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Zygogramma piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Feeding, oviposition and developmente2
Qualifier
confined within the tribe Heliantheaee2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia rotundifolia
Tithonia rotundifolia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · Second interactorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tithonia rotundifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zygogramma signatipennis (Stål) and Zygogramma piceicollis (Stål)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“Feeding, oviposition and development of both beetle species were confined within the tribe Heliantheae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both beetle species showed a very strong preference for the invasive Tithonia rotundifolia.

Taxon
T. rotundifoliaTithonia rotundifoliae0
Interactor
Zygogramma signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Zygogramma piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
very strong preferencee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia rotundifolia
Tithonia rotundifolia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · Second interactorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“very strong preference for the invasive T. rotundifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zygogramma signatipennis (Stål) and Zygogramma piceicollis (Stål)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The only non-target species supporting development to adulthood was the exotic weed Tithonia diversifolia.

Taxon
Tithonia diversifoliaTithonia diversifoliae0
Interactor
Zygogramma signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Zygogramma piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
supported development to adulthoode0
Qualifier
only non-target speciese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tithonia diversifolia
Tithonia diversifolia · TaxonThierry Caro · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · Second interactorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The only non-target species that supported development to adulthood was the exotic weed Tithonia diversifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zygogramma signatipennis (Stål) and Zygogramma piceicollis (Stål)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some sunflower (Helianthus annuus) cultivars were partially utilized by the beetles in host-specificity tests.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuuse0
Interactor
Zygogramma signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Zygogramma piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
partially utilizede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · Second interactorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars were partially utilized during host-specificity tests, none supported complete development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zygogramma signatipennis (Stål) and Zygogramma piceicollis (Stål)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the tested sunflower cultivars supported complete development of the beetles.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuuse0
Interactor
Zygogramma signatipennisZygogramma signatipennise1biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Zygogramma piceicollisZygogramma piceicollise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
complete developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma signatipennis
Zygogramma signatipennis · InteractorPavel Kirillov from St.Petersburg, Russia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zygogramma piceicollis
Zygogramma piceicollis · Second interactorFrancisco Farriols Sarabia · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars were partially utilized during host-specificity tests, none supported complete development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zygogramma signatipennis (Stål) and Zygogramma piceicollis (Stål)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–289 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that both Zygogramma species are suitable for release in South Africa against Tithonia rotundifolia.

Taxon
ZygogrammaZygogrammae0
Outcome
suitable for releasee0
Setting
South Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zygogramma
Zygogramma · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Santosh Namby chandran · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Zygogramma species are suitable for release in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1384 · show in text ↑