Paper · 2022 · Revista Brasileira de Entomologia

Community structure and specialization in fig wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) in a region of Cerrado

Nayara Santos; Jéssica Ferreira de Andrade; Rodrigo Augusto Santinelo Pereira; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Ficus inflorescences host a species-rich chalcid wasp community, including pollinating fig wasps (Agaonidae: Tetrapusinae, Kradibiinae, and Agaoninae) and several species of non-pollinating fig wasps (NPFW), that show several life-history strategies, including gall-inducers, kleptoparasites (i. e. inquilines), and parasitoids. We analyzed the structure and degree of specialization of the fig wasp community associated with Ficus inflorescences in urbanized areas, agroecosystems, and on the edge of forest fragments in the state of Goiás (Brazil). We sampled 34 wasp species in four native Ficus tree species, from which four wasp species occurred in more than one host. Neotropical fig pollinators (Pegoscapus and Tetrapus) were the most abundant species, and they were host-specific, although two pollinator species were associated with Ficus obtusifolia. The Jaccard similarity index was higher in samples of fig wasps collected in the same host, indicating that the community composition was specific to each host species. Community structure indices indicate a specialized structure with low connectance, high bidimensional Shannon H2’ and low partner diversity. The communities present a modular web structure in which modules were represented by each host and its associated insect species. These results indicate that the fig wasp communities analyzed are highly specialized, despite a few not strictly host-specific species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four native Ficus species hosted 34 sampled wasp species.

Taxon
FicusFicuse0
Interactor
waspe0other
Outcome
wasp speciese0
Value
34e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We sampled 34 wasp species in four native Ficus tree species, from which four wasp species occurred in more than one host.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four wasp species occurred on multiple Ficus hosts.

Taxon
FicusFicuse0
Interactor
waspe0other
Outcome
occurred in more than one hoste0
Value
foure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We sampled 34 wasp species in four native Ficus tree species, from which four wasp species occurred in more than one host.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neotropical fig pollinators Pegoscapus and Tetrapus were most abundant and host-specific.

Taxon
Neotropical fig pollinatorse0
Outcome
most abundant speciese0
Direction
most abundante0
Qualifier
host-specifice0

Verbatim

e0

“Neotropical fig pollinators (Pegoscapus and Tetrapus) were the most abundant species, and they were host-specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–787 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus obtusifolia was associated with two pollinator species.

Taxon
Ficus obtusifoliaFicus obtusifoliae0
Interactor
pollinatore0pollinator
Outcome
pollinator speciese0
Value
twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus obtusifolia
Ficus obtusifolia · TaxonPatrice78500 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two pollinator species were associated with Ficus obtusifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–859 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fig wasp samples from the same host had higher Jaccard similarity, indicating host-specific community composition.

Taxon
fig waspsAgaonidaee0
Outcome
Jaccard similarity indexe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
community composition was specific to each host speciese0
Comparator
same hoste0

Verbatim

e0

“The Jaccard similarity index was higher in samples of fig wasps collected in the same host, indicating that the community composition was specific to each host species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1029 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fig wasp networks showed low connectance and low partner diversity.

Taxon
fig waspe1
Outcome
connectancee0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
low partner diversitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Community structure indices indicate a specialized structure with low connectance, high bidimensional Shannon H2’ and low partner diversity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fig wasp communities analyzed are highly specialized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fig wasp networks showed high bidimensional Shannon H2’.

Taxon
fig waspe1
Outcome
bidimensional Shannon H2’e0
Direction
highe0

Verbatim

e0

“Community structure indices indicate a specialized structure with low connectance, high bidimensional Shannon H2’ and low partner diversity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fig wasp communities analyzed are highly specialized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fig wasp communities formed modular webs, with each host and associated insects representing a module.

Taxon
fig waspe1
Outcome
modular web structuree0
Qualifier
modules were represented by each host and its associated insect speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“The communities present a modular web structure in which modules were represented by each host and its associated insect species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1300 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fig wasp communities analyzed are highly specialized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1385 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The analyzed fig wasp communities were highly specialized despite some species lacking strict host specificity.

Taxon
fig waspe0
Outcome
highly specializede0
Qualifier
despite a few not strictly host-specific speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“These results indicate that the fig wasp communities analyzed are highly specialized, despite a few not strictly host-specific species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1436 · show in text ↑